2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-011-0794-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective approach based on grammar-guided genetic programming for solving multiple instance problems

Abstract: Multiple instance learning (MIL) is considered a generalization of traditional supervised learning which deals with uncertainty in the information. Together with the fact that, as in any other learning framework, the classifier performance evaluation maintains a trade-off relationship between different conflicting objectives, this makes the classification task less straightforward. This paper introduces a multi-objective proposal that works in a MIL scenario to obtain well-distributed Pareto solutions to multi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, there are many machine learning methods available to solve these problems, such as multiinstance lazy learning algorithms [43], multi-instance tree learners [8], multi-instance rule inducers [9], multi-instance bayesian approaches [27], multi-instance kernel methods [22,38], multi-instance ensembles [45,51], and evolutionary algorithms [48,50]. However, most of the MIL algorithms are very slow and cannot be applied to large data sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, there are many machine learning methods available to solve these problems, such as multiinstance lazy learning algorithms [43], multi-instance tree learners [8], multi-instance rule inducers [9], multi-instance bayesian approaches [27], multi-instance kernel methods [22,38], multi-instance ensembles [45,51], and evolutionary algorithms [48,50]. However, most of the MIL algorithms are very slow and cannot be applied to large data sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%