2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective design optimization of variable stiffness composite cylinders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting curve, or hyper-surface in case of higher dimensions, is a low cost approximation for the costly high fidelity model that is used for function calls in MBDO process. Among several metamodeling techniques developed for engineering design optimization purposes [21,22], the radial basis functions (RBF) offer accurate and reliable predictions at a relatively low computational cost for buckling response of VS composite structures [7,8]. Therefore, RBF-based metamodels were used in this study to construct surrogate models relating the buckling load (F cr ) to the design variables (T i 's).…”
Section: Design Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The resulting curve, or hyper-surface in case of higher dimensions, is a low cost approximation for the costly high fidelity model that is used for function calls in MBDO process. Among several metamodeling techniques developed for engineering design optimization purposes [21,22], the radial basis functions (RBF) offer accurate and reliable predictions at a relatively low computational cost for buckling response of VS composite structures [7,8]. Therefore, RBF-based metamodels were used in this study to construct surrogate models relating the buckling load (F cr ) to the design variables (T i 's).…”
Section: Design Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting so-called variable stiffness (VS) composite laminate offers the designers more scope to use the directional properties of the material more efficiently to produce VS composite cylinders [5,6,7,8,9] with better structural performance compared with their traditional Constant Stiffness (CS) counterparts. However, this improvement is at the expense of adding more complexity to the design optimization process because of the increased number of design variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several examples of research works on the design and optimization of composite materials have demonstrated the potential of the variable-stiffness design to improve the in-plane stiffness Nik et al, 2012), buckling resistance (Hyer and Lee, 1991;Wu et al, 2013), strength (Lopes et al, 2008;Khani et al, 2011), vibration response (Abdalla et al, 2007;Blom et al, 2008;Ribeiro and Akhavan, 2012;Ribeiro et al, 2014;Ribeiro, 2015a-b;Yazdani et Ribeiro, 2015;Venkatachari et al, 2016) and bending properties (Blom et al,2010;Rouhi et al ,2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%