2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-013-0766-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective modeling for preventive maintenance scheduling in a multiple production line

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They developed a unit-cost cumulative reliability expectation measure to evaluate the extent to which maintaining each individual component benefits the total maintenance cost and system reliability over the operational lifetime. Ebrahimipour et al (2013) developed a multi-objective PM scheduling model in a multiple production line. They defined the reliability of production lines and the costs of maintenance, failure and downtime of a system as multiple objectives, and different thresholds for available manpower, spare part inventory and periods under maintenance were applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They developed a unit-cost cumulative reliability expectation measure to evaluate the extent to which maintaining each individual component benefits the total maintenance cost and system reliability over the operational lifetime. Ebrahimipour et al (2013) developed a multi-objective PM scheduling model in a multiple production line. They defined the reliability of production lines and the costs of maintenance, failure and downtime of a system as multiple objectives, and different thresholds for available manpower, spare part inventory and periods under maintenance were applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The producing iron castings problem is the motivation for present work in foundry enterprise. In recent years, experts and scholars have put many researches' focus on the scheduling optimization algorithm and proposed some effective methods or models, such as multiobjective evolutionary algorithms [9] (DLP, Deterministic Linear Programming [10], ACO, Ant Colony Optimization [11], ABC, Artificial Bee Colony [12], AIA, Artificial Immune Algorithm [13], UGF, Universal Generation Function [14], and MIP, Mixed-Integer Programming [15]) and decision support optimization and simulation (SLP, System Layout Planning [16], MIND, Method for Analysis of Industrial Energy Systems [17], M&FS, Mass and Fuzzy Sets [18], SDST, Spreadsheet Decision Support Tool [19], SDSM, Scheduling Decision Support Model [20], TOFPS, Two-phase Order Fulfillment Planning Structure [21], and ERP&NN, ERP System including Neural Network [22]).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greater fitness value of chromosome is, the better quality of chromosome is. The minimum value (min ) of total cost of production planning is obtained by (14). Because the total amount of all orders ( ) is fixed, in order to standardize calculation process of IGA, the maximum profit rate of all orders (max Pr) is defined as the objective of IGA which is shown as (15):…”
Section: Fitness Evaluation Fitness Function Of Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-objective decisions are often used in line- seru conversion (Kaku et al 2009 ; Yu et al 2013 , 2014 ). However, multi-objective optimization is more difficult to solve than single-objective optimization (Ebrahimipour et al 2015 ). Enumeration algorithm based on non-dominated sorting (Deb et al 2002 ) for multi-objective line- seru conversion is described as follows.…”
Section: Two Improved Exact Approaches For Multi-objective Line- mentioning
confidence: 99%