2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12062318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Optimal Allocation of Wireless Bus Charging Stations Considering Costs and the Environmental Impact

Abstract: In recent years, due to environmental concerns, there has been an increasing desire to develop alternative solutions to traditional energy sources. Since transportation is a significant fossil-fuel consumer, the development of electric vehicles, especially buses, has the potential to reduce fossil-fuel use and thus provide a better living environment. The aim of the current work was to develop an optimal allocation model for designing a system-wide network of wireless bus charging stations. The main advantages… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They analyzed the charging-facility-choice equilibrium of electric vehicles among the locations and two types of charging facilities. Nahum and Hadas [10] developed an optimal allocation model for wireless charging stations of electric bus. They suggested a non-linear optimization model with multiple objectives; (1) minimize the costs, (2) maximize the environmental benefit, (3) minimize the number of charging stations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They analyzed the charging-facility-choice equilibrium of electric vehicles among the locations and two types of charging facilities. Nahum and Hadas [10] developed an optimal allocation model for wireless charging stations of electric bus. They suggested a non-linear optimization model with multiple objectives; (1) minimize the costs, (2) maximize the environmental benefit, (3) minimize the number of charging stations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously mentioned, DWPT has advantages; Charging the EV dynamically (in-motion) can be translated to a significantly reduced battery size requirement, and the fact that the charging process may occur under both static and dynamic conditions, hence offering extended or even unlimited travel range. For example, the BYD K9 electric bus has a 324 kWh battery weighing 1500 kg which requires recharge of 6 hours every 250 km, compared to an the OLEV bus that uses a 13 kWh battery weighing only 130 kg that can be charged in less than 5 minutes [14]. As most public transport buses have fixed routes, it is possible to design an optimal allocation of charging stations along the route, considering the dwell time at the stops.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers have dealt with the problem of finding the optimal location for installing transmitting coils from a logistical managerial point of view [15]- [18]. A recent paper by Nahum and Hadas [14] proposed an optimal allocation model for designing a systemwide network of wireless bus charging stations. In this work, the suggested approach consisted of a multi-objective model that selected the locations for the charging stations (i.e., road embedded transmitting coils) while (a) minimizing the costs, (b) maximizing the environmental benefit, and (c) minimizing the number of charging stations.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A multi-objective optimization algorithm is a hot research issue in the field of system management, which generally refers to an optimization problem with a target number greater than four. Its research aim is to solve a set of Pareto solution sets that converge to the real Pareto front and are evenly distributed as much as possible [21]. Scholars have developed the multi-objective optimization algorithm to solve practical engineering problems such as allocation of wireless bus charging stations [22] and allocation of hybrid renewable energy systems [23].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%