2017
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2017.2722478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Optimization for Distributed MIMO Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These performance metrics often conflict with each other, and an increase in one metric may lead to a decrease in another metric. Thus, MOO theory has been a promising mathematical tool to cope with the existence of multiple metrics and reveal the tradeoffs among them [18], [19]. For example, the author in [18] developed an MOO framework in cognitive radio networks with SWIPT incorporating three system design objectives: total transmit power minimization, EHE maximization, and interference-power-leakage-totransmit-power ratio minimization.…”
Section: A Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These performance metrics often conflict with each other, and an increase in one metric may lead to a decrease in another metric. Thus, MOO theory has been a promising mathematical tool to cope with the existence of multiple metrics and reveal the tradeoffs among them [18], [19]. For example, the author in [18] developed an MOO framework in cognitive radio networks with SWIPT incorporating three system design objectives: total transmit power minimization, EHE maximization, and interference-power-leakage-totransmit-power ratio minimization.…”
Section: A Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the author in [18] developed an MOO framework in cognitive radio networks with SWIPT incorporating three system design objectives: total transmit power minimization, EHE maximization, and interference-power-leakage-totransmit-power ratio minimization. Reference [19] utilized MOO theory to study three critical issues for MIMO interference networks, i.e., signal transmission, energy and security.…”
Section: A Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to deal with the non-convexity of (21), an SCA based algorithm is proposed to approximate the nonconvex part via its appropriate convex bound [42], [43]. Define F 4 (X ) = Tr(X )−λ max (X ), its convex upper bound F 4 (X , X (n) ) can be given as [45]- [47], i.e.,…”
Section: A Successive Convex Approximation Based Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is still difficult to solve because of the rank-1 constraint. By expressing the rank-1 constraint as Tr(X ) − λ max (X ) ≤ ς [46], [47], we can transform problem (42) to…”
Section: A Successive Convex Approximation Based Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the joint EE and SE maximization problem is formulated as a multiobjective optimization (MOO) problem, which tries to maximize the two conflicting objectives simultaneously subject to the partition of spectral resources among the CBS and DBSs, the minimum QoS requirements, and maximum input power constraint. The MOO problem is transformed into a single objective optimization (SOO) problem using the Weighted Tchebycheff method [10]. The transformed SOO problem can Figure 2: Proposed radio resource management procedure CDSA-based 5G networks be solved using standard interior point methods, such as LDD method, allowing us to obtain the Pareto optimal solution resulting in a complete Pareto-Frontier curve by dynamically adjusting the weights of both the objectives.…”
Section: Bsmentioning
confidence: 99%