2009 International Conference on Computers &Amp; Industrial Engineering 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iccie.2009.5223746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective optimization for part quality in stereolithography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve the mechanical properties of the parts, many researchers have investigated different aspects of SLA technique, recently. For example, Roysarkar et al (2009) carried out a multi-objective optimization to improve the part quality in SLA process. Zhou et al (2000) carried out a parametric process optimization to improve the accuracy of rapid prototyped SLA parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the mechanical properties of the parts, many researchers have investigated different aspects of SLA technique, recently. For example, Roysarkar et al (2009) carried out a multi-objective optimization to improve the part quality in SLA process. Zhou et al (2000) carried out a parametric process optimization to improve the accuracy of rapid prototyped SLA parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these include warpage, the presence of unreacted and potentially extractable monomers, and unknown green strengths of stereolithography parts. The final part strength is known to vary when using different operating conditions including layer thickness , over‐cure depth , light intensity , scanning velocity , and post curing time . The effects of these strength variations were found through extensive testing of materials without any modeling or in situ material analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Griffiths et al [226] investigated a DoE method for the optimization of FDM-built components for SEC, processing time, the weight of the part, and waste. A MO optimization method for part quality in SLA was presented by Roysarkar et al [227] and optimized the processing time, dimensional, and surface quality by considering the controlling process parameters. Another MO optimization scheme was studied for FDM components by Gurrala, Regalla [228] and optimized volumetric shrinkage and strength considering various controlling parameters by using the NSGA-II, and a relationship between objectives and input process parameters was developed by performing minimum experimentation.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimization For Ammentioning
confidence: 99%