Multi-objective optimization framework to obtain model-based guidelines for tuning biological synthetic devices: an adaptive network case

Abstract

BackgroundModel based design plays a fundamental role in synthetic biology. Exploiting modularity, i.e. using biological parts and interconnecting them to build new and more complex biological circuits is one of the key issues. In this context, mathematical models have been used to generate predictions of the behavior of the designed device. Designers not only want the ability to predict the circuit behavior once all its components have been determined, but also to help on the design and selection of its biological parts, i.e. to provide guidelines for the experimental implementation. This is tantamount to obtaining proper values of the model parameters, for the circuit behavior results from the interplay between model structure and parameters tuning. However, determining crisp values for parameters of the involved parts is not a realistic approach. Uncertainty is ubiquitous to biology, and the characterization of biological parts is not exempt from it. Moreover, the desired dynamical behavior for the designed circuit usually results from a trade-off among several goals to be optimized.ResultsWe propose the use of a multi-objective optimization tuning framework to get a model-based set of guidelines for the selection of the kinetic parameters required to build a biological device with desired behavior. The design criteria are encoded in the formulation of the objectives and optimization problem itself. As a result, on the one hand the designer obtains qualitative regions/intervals of values of the circuit parameters giving rise to the predefined circuit behavior; on the other hand, he obtains useful information for its guidance in the implementation process. These parameters are chosen so that they can effectively be tuned at the wet-lab, i.e. they are effective biological tuning knobs. To show the proposed approach, the methodology is applied to the design of a well known biological circuit: a genetic incoherent feed-forward circuit showing adaptive behavior.ConclusionThe proposed multi-objective optimization design framework is able to provide effective guidelines to tune biological parameters so as to achieve a desired circuit behavior. Moreover, it is easy to analyze the impact of the context on the synthetic device to be designed. That is, one can analyze how the presence of a downstream load influences the performance of the designed circuit, and take it into account.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12918-016-0269-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Optimal Regulatory Circuit Topologies for Fold-Change Detection

“…pothesize that the observed circuits show optimal tradeoff between key tasks. To test this, we use a Pareto optimality approach (El Samad et al, 2005a;Shoval et al, 2012;Warmflash et al, 2012;Szekely et al, 2013;Boada et al, 2016). We demonstrate that the two topologies observed in biological systems are among the very few that show an optimal tradeoff of amplitude versus speed and amplitude versus noise resistance.…”

Characterization of Gene Circuit Parts Based on Multiobjective Optimization by Using Standard Calibrated Measurements

“…[12] The multiobjective optimization design (MOOD) framework to perform model parameter estimation has been successfully used for the optimal design of gene networks, [13,14] complex systemsi dentification, [15] or closed-loop systemsi dentification. [12] The multiobjective optimization design (MOOD) framework to perform model parameter estimation has been successfully used for the optimal design of gene networks, [13,14] complex systemsi dentification, [15] or closed-loop systemsi dentification.…”

“…the richnesso ft he information collected from an experiment, that is, how useful it will be to improve the estimation of the model parameters, may strongly depend on the true value of the parameters. [12] The multiobjective optimization design (MOOD) framework to perform model parameter estimation has been successfully used for the optimal design of gene networks, [13,14] complex systemsi dentification, [15] or closed-loop systemsi dentification. [16] It allows the following problems, which are difficult to tackle by using single-or weighted-objective optimizationa pproaches often found in syntheticg ene networks, to be addressed:1 )lack of identifiability,w hich is caused by overparametrization and multimodality of certain model parameters in the parameters space due to nonconvexity,s ince the MOOD approachc an provide all sets of parameters compatible with the objectives for optimization;2 )parameter selectionf itting, which is at rade-off between accuracy and model complexity or between multiple desired model performance specifications, since am ulticriteria decision-making (MCDM) strategy to select the most suitable solutionsi si ntegrated in the MOOD framework;3 )consideration of experimental context (e.g.,c ulture growth conditions) by including growth and experiment-relatedo bjectives, and4 )consideration of circuit contexts, sincet he estimation of parameters for ap art, or as et of parts, of interestc an be performed by using differentgene circuits that all share the parts of interest.…”

System-level analysis of metabolic trade-offs during anaerobic photoheterotrophic growth inRhodopseudomonas palustris

“…Thus, this method examines the interactions between three system objectives (growth and the two constraints). Other MO-based studies have provided important insights for systems bioengineering, including the relationships between environments and regulatory mechanisms [27][28][29], the minimal number and combination of augmentations to a system that would result in greatest amount of strain optimization [30,31], and guidelines for tuning synthetic biology devices [32].…”