2022
DOI: 10.5194/ms-13-123-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective optimization of a redundantly actuated parallel robot mechanism for special machining

Abstract: Abstract. In order to improve the accuracy and efficiency of special machining for a complex surface, a 2RPU-2SPR (where R, P, U, and S stand for revolute, prismatic, universal, and spherical joints, respectively) over-constrained redundantly actuated parallel robot mechanism is proposed. And six performance evaluation indexes are established to ensure the working performance including workspace, motion/force transmission efficiency, stiffness, dexterity, energy efficiency, and the inertia coupling index. Furt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the dynamic simulation model combined with the specific structure of the device and methods from related articles [24][25][26][27], the length and position of the hinge pin, the position of the support wheel holder, and the length of the pushrod were determined as optimization objects; variables were created and their variation ranges were determined based on the 3D model, as shown in Table 5. The variables are parametrically modeled in Adams/View according to the variation of each variable so that the model can be modified quickly and the optimization can be carried out smoothly.…”
Section: Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the dynamic simulation model combined with the specific structure of the device and methods from related articles [24][25][26][27], the length and position of the hinge pin, the position of the support wheel holder, and the length of the pushrod were determined as optimization objects; variables were created and their variation ranges were determined based on the 3D model, as shown in Table 5. The variables are parametrically modeled in Adams/View according to the variation of each variable so that the model can be modified quickly and the optimization can be carried out smoothly.…”
Section: Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding optimization objective function values are named the Pareto front. Many numerical algorithms for solving MOPs have been developed, such as the immune algorithm (Chen et al, 2019), particle swarm optimization (Peng et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2022) and the genetic algorithm (Du et al, 2016). These algorithms are mainly based on bionics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qi et al [23] conducted a multi-objective optimization of a typical parallel tracking mechanism under comprehensive consideration of the kinematics, stiffness, workspace, and dynamic performances, while considering manufacturing and assembly errors. Zhang et al [24] used the PSO algorithm to perform multi-objective optimization of the workspace, dexterity, stiffness, energy efficiency, motion/force transfer efficiency, and inertial coupling index of the established 2RPU-2SPR super-constrained redundantly driven parallel mechanism. Mirshekari et al [25] studied the effects of different parameters, such as the rotation joint angle and spherical joint position of the 6-RUS parallel robot mobile platform on the workspace, kinematics and dynamics indices, and they used the bees algorithm approach to optimize the manipulator structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%