2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective optimization of concrete mixture proportions using machine learning and metaheuristic algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined algorithms RF, gradient boosting tree (GBDT), and extreme gradient boosting tree (XGBoost) all combine many DTs. In terms of model performance, XGBoost > GBDT > RF, RF prediction accuracy is comparable to ANN (Chopra et al 2018), better than RVM (Shaqadan and Alrawashdeh 2018), and has a superior fitting impact on the discretized distribution sample space when compared to ANN (Zhang et al 2020b). GBRT helps to address RF model overfitting and other difficulties by continuously adding new trees and altering the residual region, resulting in higher prediction performance (Zhang et al 2020a).…”
Section: Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The combined algorithms RF, gradient boosting tree (GBDT), and extreme gradient boosting tree (XGBoost) all combine many DTs. In terms of model performance, XGBoost > GBDT > RF, RF prediction accuracy is comparable to ANN (Chopra et al 2018), better than RVM (Shaqadan and Alrawashdeh 2018), and has a superior fitting impact on the discretized distribution sample space when compared to ANN (Zhang et al 2020b). GBRT helps to address RF model overfitting and other difficulties by continuously adding new trees and altering the residual region, resulting in higher prediction performance (Zhang et al 2020a).…”
Section: Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The separations (d + i and d − i ) of each solution from the positive ideal solution and negative ideal solution are given as Equations (16) and (17). The relative closeness coefficient (R i ) can be calculated by Equation (18).…”
Section: Choice Criteria For Moo Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to achieve a designed performance that meets requirements [16,17]. When there is only one objective to be optimized, the traditional experimental-based method is generally feasible [18]. However, 2 of 26 in most cases, proportion optimization of asphalt mixture is a complex problem, which needs to optimize multiple objectives simultaneously, such as performances, cost and environmental pollution, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is increasingly common to optimize the mixture using computational optimization methods. There are many different optimization methods such as Taguchi [15][16][17] and machine learning [18][19][20][21][22] methods. The Taguchi optimization method is one of the most preferred optimization methods to optimize experimental parameters because it is used both in analysis and optimization [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%