2019
DOI: 10.12691/ajme-7-2-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective Optimization of Passive Shock Absorber for Landing Gear

Abstract: In order to solve the mass variation problem of aircraft landing gears, usually, semi-active or active shock absorbers are considered first. In this study, however, several types of metering pin constructions are proposed, and have been obtained optimal solutions through multi-objective optimization. The multi-objective optimization methods to find optimum solutions of metering pin dimensions, displacements and the initial pressure of gas are proposed to deal with the mass variation problem. The optimum pareto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A typical shock absorber with an existing single modified tapered metering pin design is illustrated in [12]. A metering pin with a variable cross-section is linked to the lower piston.…”
Section: Design Model For Metering Pinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical shock absorber with an existing single modified tapered metering pin design is illustrated in [12]. A metering pin with a variable cross-section is linked to the lower piston.…”
Section: Design Model For Metering Pinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the landing efficiency, the metering pin is always embedded to change the orifice gap, and thereafter the buffering force according to the flow velocity and available stroke. However, passive SAs even with a well-designed orifice shape cannot generate an appropriate damping force with different conditions subjected to varying gross weight and impact velocity (Shi et al, 2019). In addition, the landing efficiency is far from meeting the demands because of the lack of realtime adaptability to variable crash environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chester [11] employed a parametric method to simulate landing impact, determining the reaction of the main and nose gears by pitching and heaving degrees of freedom of the aircraft motion. Shi [12] and Shi et al [13] performed single and multi-objective optimization studies of passive shock absorber for landing gears by considering four types of metering pins including conventional taper pin, multi-taper, single-parabolic and multiparabolic configurations. Asthana and Bhat [14] proposed a novel design of landing gear oleo strut damper using magnetorheological fluid for aircraft and UAVs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%