2020 Ieee Andescon 2020
DOI: 10.1109/andescon50619.2020.9272030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Robot platform with features of Cyber-physical systems for education applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mohamed et al [52] review engineering tools and languages for CPSs. Most existing platforms, however, tend to (1) require a large initial learning curve, making them unsuitable for educational purposes; (2) offer insufficient performance capabilities to support their use for prototyping state-of-the-art algorithms and ICPSs; or (3) solely focus on a single aspect of ICPSs, restricting their ability to demonstrate and explore all the elements that make up a complete ICPS [53].…”
Section: Literature Gaps and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohamed et al [52] review engineering tools and languages for CPSs. Most existing platforms, however, tend to (1) require a large initial learning curve, making them unsuitable for educational purposes; (2) offer insufficient performance capabilities to support their use for prototyping state-of-the-art algorithms and ICPSs; or (3) solely focus on a single aspect of ICPSs, restricting their ability to demonstrate and explore all the elements that make up a complete ICPS [53].…”
Section: Literature Gaps and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas teaching tools is when the IoT devices is developed or operated by the mentors or teachers. (Setiawan, 2020), (Verner et al, 2020), (He et al, 2017), (Jaklič, 2020), (Escobar et al, 2020), (Besari et al, 2017), (Zaharov et al, 2018), (Hauß et al, 2020) Non-Engineering (Paganelli et al, 2019), (Gunasekera et al, 2018a) There are seven IoT platforms are mentioned, Blynk, Node-Red IoT, FIWARE, SiteWhere, ThingsBoard, ThingSpeak, ThingsBoard. Based on the reviews, there are 2 types of how the researches use IoT platforms on their Strategy Authors Learning Media (Ga et al, 2021), (Asraf et al, 2018), (Paganelli et al, 2019), (Gunasekera et al, 2018a), (Mayer et al, 2020), (Guerrero-Osuna et al, 2021), (Setiawan, 2020), (Verner et al, 2020), (He et al, 2017), (Jaklič, 2020), (Besari et al, 2017), (Zaharov et al, 2018), (Hauß et al, 2020) Teaching Tool (Andrada Tivani et al, 2020), (Escobar et al, 2020) Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Istanbul, Turkey, March 7-10, 2022…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such as IoT based projects to learn programming and engineering subjects, introducing IoT as new technology (Paganelli et al, 2019), learning other subjects besides IoT and programming like biomedical as shown on Figure7 (Setiawan, 2020), robotics (Verner et al, 2020), production line (Zaharov et al, 2018), or agriculture (Gunasekera et al, 2018b). Meanwhile, for teaching tools, the teachers themselves operated or developed the device to assist in the teaching processes as if MQTT protocol teaching (Andrada Tivani et al, 2020) and multi-robot platform for teaching automation system as shown on Figure 8 (Escobar et al, 2020).…”
Section: Iot Platforms Application Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%