2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-scale ocean response to a large tidal stream turbine array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wave conditions were acquired from the ERA-Interim reanalysis (Dee et al, 2011). Significant wave height, mean wave period and mean wave direction were downloaded from the ECMWF website at http://www.ecmwf.int/en/research/ climate-reanalysis/.…”
Section: Carbon and Nitrogen Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wave conditions were acquired from the ERA-Interim reanalysis (Dee et al, 2011). Significant wave height, mean wave period and mean wave direction were downloaded from the ECMWF website at http://www.ecmwf.int/en/research/ climate-reanalysis/.…”
Section: Carbon and Nitrogen Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in habitats from MRE development is likely to be a manageable risk as the footprint on the seafloor or in the water column is relatively small [78], and the risks can easily be informed and evaluated on the basis of extensive knowledge of effects from other industries such as oil and gas operations at sea [79], presence of offshore wind towers and platforms [80], effects of cable laying [48], and a wide range of fishing activities. Changes in physical oceanographic systems can be realized by changing water flow around a bottom-mounted or floating turbine, as well as decreasing wave heights and other effects of removing energy from ocean water in the form of MRE generation [81][82][83]. However, the natural variability of the systems is much higher than could possibly be measured for small numbers of devices [84].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on six biologic and physical environmental variables have been provided from runs of the NEMO‐ERSEM 3D‐coupled hydrodynamic‐ecosystem model (Edwards, Barciela, & Butenschön, ; O'Dea et al., ; Wakelin, Artioli, Butenschön, & Holt, ). These are a subset of variables that are expected to change with both climate change (Holt, Butenschon et al., ; Holt, Hughes et al., ; Wakelin et al., ) and potentially as a consequence of large‐scale energy extraction for renewable energy (De Dominicis et al., ; Van der Molen et al., ) and also that capture key changes in habitats (Figs. S5, S6 in Appendix ): bottom temperature (BT) (°C), maximum chlorophyll_ a (CHL) (mgC/m 3 ), net primary production (NPP) (mgC/m 2 /day), potential energy anomaly (PEA) (J/m 3 ) (which is the energy required to mix the water column completely), depth‐averaged horizontal current speed (SP) (m/s), and depth‐averaged vertical velocity (DVV) (m/day).…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We fit these models to the spatial patterns of eight mobile marine competing and predator–prey species: grey and harbor seals, harbor porpoise, common guillemot, black‐legged kittiwake, northern gannet, Atlantic herring and sandeels. The modeling approach used six physical and biologic variables that are predicted to change with climate change (Holt, Butenschon, Wakelin, Artioli, & Allen, ; Holt, Hughes et al., ) and energy extraction (De Dominicis, O'Hara Murray, & Wolf, ; Van der Molen, Ruardij, & Greenwood, ) and have been considered to be important habitat variables for a range of species: temperature, levels of maximum and cumulative primary production, levels of stratification and aspects of speed, and both horizontal and vertical (Bailey & Thompson, ; Bost et al., ; Carroll et al., ; Schick et al., ; Scott et al., ; Sharples, Scott, & Inall, ). This study sets out to identify which of the bio/physical variables play the most significant role in determining habitat preferences of the selected marine species, defines habitat preferences, measures estimated effect of the bio/physical variables on the selected species, and investigates whether there are common spatial trends for competing and predator–prey species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%