2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11265-012-0701-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-source Neural Activity Estimation and Sensor Scheduling: Algorithms and Hardware Implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When applied to MEG data from a median nerve stimulation, the adaptive SMC was able to find the same strong sources that were obtained by other methods (particle filtering, dSPM, sLORETA); our SMC also localized additional weak sources that appear to be in accordance with the results of Miao et al 7…”
Section: Poster Presentationssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…When applied to MEG data from a median nerve stimulation, the adaptive SMC was able to find the same strong sources that were obtained by other methods (particle filtering, dSPM, sLORETA); our SMC also localized additional weak sources that appear to be in accordance with the results of Miao et al 7…”
Section: Poster Presentationssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Bayesian estimation techniques, such as the particle filtering algorithm [30], have been used to track neural activity dipole sources [93,94]. However, as the number of dipole sources increases, the computation complexity of the PF tracking algorithm grows proportionally.…”
Section: Hardware Implementation Evaluation Of Proposed Sensor Schedumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As these parameters change relatively slowly in time (each dipole can remain active from few milliseconds up to several hundreds), there is benefit in using the a priori information that the neural currents change smoothly in time. Indeed, in the last decade there has been growing interest towards Bayesian filtering [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Here the posterior distribution of the neural sources at time t (the filtering ditribution) is obtained from the posterior distribution of the neural sources at time t − 1 with a two-step process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%