2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering 2009
DOI: 10.1109/csie.2009.67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-stage Dynamic Coordination Model for Large-Scale Crowd's Activities Based on Multi-agent

Abstract: In order to reduce the phenomena of long time queuing and congestion in large-scale crowds' activities, improve the visitors' satisfaction and increase social welfare, a multi-stage dynamic coordination model for large scale crowds' activities based on multi-agent is proposed and a coordination algorithm PCI is designed. Three types of basic coordination algorithms are tested by computer simulation, and the simulation results are used to discuss the basic characteristics of the problem. The results indicate th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Randomly generating the destination for each agent could contribute to balance the geographical distribution of agents and avoid the concentration of agents in certain attractions [20]. Therefore, the NWA at each attraction is relatively small, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomly generating the destination for each agent could contribute to balance the geographical distribution of agents and avoid the concentration of agents in certain attractions [20]. Therefore, the NWA at each attraction is relatively small, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zheng et al [30] evaluated the performance of three coordination approaches based on a multiagent simulation and believed that both the crowding situation and distance between each pair of rides should be taken into account when coordinating tourists' itineraries. In addition to crowding situations and distance, some studies have considered tourists' preferences [31,32]. Ahmadi [26] coordinated tourists' routing sequences by optimizing a ride's capacity and then generating the desired transition pattern.…”
Section: Crowding Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizers of large-scale exhibitions use two methods of tourist coordination control: (1) designing an overall route for tourists based on their preferences and group coordination or (2) deciding the next visiting stop for tourists based on a preferential selection mechanism [31]. Due to the complexity and interactivity of tourist movements in a theme park, the latter coordination control methods have shown greater promise for crowding mitigation in theme parks [31]. Most existing coordination mechanisms organize tourists' visit sequences based on the current crowd situation.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…diversion is likely to cause Matthew Effect. So Li Jin and others allocated the tourists to different routes with Logit Model and avoid the Mathew Effect to a great extent [16]. For the advantages of Logit Model, it can perfectly reflect the crowd and random factors during the route selection so as to realize the even space-time distribution of tourists and ensure the reasonable configuration of resources.…”
Section: Logit Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%