TENCON 2011 - 2011 IEEE Region 10 Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/tencon.2011.6129198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-TAP architecture for IP core testing and debugging on network-on-chip

Abstract: With the trend to deep-sub-micron (DSM) technology, the ability for post-fabrication testing has become a big concern for system-on-chip (SoC) designers. The testing problem of network-based SoCs is categorized into two major parts, intellectual property (IP) core testing and communication infrastructure testing. This paper presents an IP testing platform using multiple-test-access-port (multi-TAP) for mesh-based networkon-chip (NoC). In our approach, the TAP ports of IPs are connected together in a daisy chai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of [17] proposed a Built-in Self Test (BIST)-based boundary scan architecture to at-speed test of cross talk faults for inter-switch communication links (interconnection between two nodes) in NoC. At the end of the paper, the number of clocks is calculated using a [20]. Chakrabarty and Goel et al [10] presented two lower bound formulations for SoC testing time models when dedicated bus-based Test Access Mechanism (TAM) is used.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [17] proposed a Built-in Self Test (BIST)-based boundary scan architecture to at-speed test of cross talk faults for inter-switch communication links (interconnection between two nodes) in NoC. At the end of the paper, the number of clocks is calculated using a [20]. Chakrabarty and Goel et al [10] presented two lower bound formulations for SoC testing time models when dedicated bus-based Test Access Mechanism (TAM) is used.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%