2015 IEEE Power &Amp; Energy Society General Meeting 2015
DOI: 10.1109/pesgm.2015.7286640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-time interval power system state estimation incorporating phasor measurements

Abstract: Although much of today's power system remains steady, the integrations of wind power make a portion of the system become fluctuant. To monitor these fluctuations, we need to utilize phasor measurements and shorten the time interval for state estimation. On the other hand, however, this means huge increase in computation burden. As a tradeoff between accuracy and computation efficiency, a multi-time interval state estimation approach for power systems is proposed in this paper, in which fluctuant states are est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that when the states are the voltages expressed in rectangular coordinates and PMU measurements are used, SE can be performed efficiently by (linear) weighted least squares or the Kalman filter, whose performance is thoroughly analyzed in [28]. Depending on the variability of power injections, it is also possible to partition the network into three areas, i.e., steady, quasi-steady, and fluctuant, and perform a multi-time scale SE [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that when the states are the voltages expressed in rectangular coordinates and PMU measurements are used, SE can be performed efficiently by (linear) weighted least squares or the Kalman filter, whose performance is thoroughly analyzed in [28]. Depending on the variability of power injections, it is also possible to partition the network into three areas, i.e., steady, quasi-steady, and fluctuant, and perform a multi-time scale SE [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Reference 21, power system state estimation is first performed by RTU (remote terminal unit) measurements only, deem its state estimates as pseudo‐measurements, and estimate the final states with these pseudo‐measurements along with PMUs via linear estimation. A multi‐time interval state estimation method is proposed in Reference 22. In the article, power networks are partitioned to the steady area, quasi‐steady area, and fluctuant area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State estimators using both unsynchronized conventional measurements and synchronized phasor measurements are called hybrid state estimation (HSE) and can be classified into two major categories: one‐phase and two‐phase SEs . In the first category, the SE jointly processes both SCADA and PMU measurements, while in the second category, SCADA and PMU data are processed by separate SE modules . In terms of accuracy, one‐phase state estimators outperform two‐phase ones, because they permit to spread benefits of phasor measurements in all buses …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 In the first category, the SE jointly processes both SCADA and PMU measurements, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] while in the second category, SCADA and PMU data are processed by separate SE modules. 18,19,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] In terms of accuracy, one-phase state estimators outperform two-phase ones, because they permit to spread benefits of phasor measurements in all buses. 28 In this paper, a new SE framework is proposed for processing RTU and PMU measurements separately in order to leave the traditional weighted least square (WLS)-based SE software unchanged.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%