2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-017-0009-4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-trait analysis of genome-wide association summary statistics using MTAG

Abstract: We introduce Multi-Trait Analysis of GWAS (MTAG), a method for joint analysis of summary statistics from GWASs of different traits, possibly from overlapping samples. We apply MTAG to summary statistics for depressive symptoms (Neff = 354,862), neuroticism (N = 168,105), and subjective well-being (N = 388,538). Compared to 32, 9, and 13 genome-wide significant loci in the single-trait GWASs (most of which are themselves novel), MTAG increases the number of loci to 64, 37, and 49, respectively. Moreover, associ… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

34
1,128
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 876 publications
(1,165 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
34
1,128
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We use two, large independent samples to test the replicability of this association. In both samples, PGS for neuroticism was calculated based on the coefficient estimates from a large genome‐wide association study (GWAS) of neuroticism (N = 168 105) . A higher genetic propensity to neuroticism was expected to be associated with lower sleep quality concurrently and over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use two, large independent samples to test the replicability of this association. In both samples, PGS for neuroticism was calculated based on the coefficient estimates from a large genome‐wide association study (GWAS) of neuroticism (N = 168 105) . A higher genetic propensity to neuroticism was expected to be associated with lower sleep quality concurrently and over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of calculating an ABF for an association between a given variant and a given trait measured in one GWAS, we calculate an ABF for an association between a variant and an arbitrary number of traits, n, measured in independent or (partially) overlapping studies. Recently, multivariate analysis of GWAS summary statistics has been implemented by the MTAG approach (Turley et al, ) and a framework involving Bayes factors to compare models of association has been developed to help determine relevant tissues in eQTL data (Flutre et al, ). When extending Wakefield's ABF to the multivariate case, trueβˆ, which was a single effect size estimate from a single GWAS, becomes trueβˆ, an n‐vector of effect size estimates from each of the n studies included in the meta‐analysis.…”
Section: The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, combining multiple studies introduces the possibility of correlated true effects between pairs of them, which we capture in the terms ρi,j:i,j{1,,n}. boldΣ=[]σ12ρ1,2σ1σ20.33emρ1,nσ1σnρ1,2σ1σ2σ220.33emρ2,nσ2σnρ1,nσ1σnρ2,nσ2σn0.33emσn2. This matrix has a similar role as the boldΩ matrix in the MTAG approach ( Turley et al, ). Thus, by writing f(bold-italicx;bold-italicm,bold-italicV) for the density of a multivariate normal distribution with mean vector bold-italicm and covariance matrix bold-italicV, evaluated at bold-italicx, Equation becomes ABF=f(trueβˆ;bold-italic0,Vbold-italicβˆ+boldΣ)f(trueβˆ;bold-italic0,Vbold-italicβˆ).…”
Section: The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the use of this method is limited in practice, because the common risk factors shared by the trait and covariates are often not identified or measured in GWAS. In recent years, joint analytic methods of multiple traits, either using individual data or GWAS summary statistics of single traits, have been developed (Bhattacharjee et al, 2012; Chung, Yang, Li, Gelernter, & Zhao, 2014; Cotsapas et al, 2011; Hackinger & Zeggini, 2017; Huang, Johnson, & O’Donnell, 2011; Solovieff et al, 2013; Turley et al, 2018; Zhu et al, 2015). These multi-trait methods can gain substantial statistical power in certain situations, in particular in the presence of pleiotropy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%