2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1805.11752
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-turn Dialogue Response Generation in an Adversarial Learning Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [157], also the authors based on MC-GAN, introduced a model to produce high resolution images by adding the StackGAN to generator. Olabiyi et al [158] proposed an adversarial network to generate multi-turn dialogue answers. The framework is based on conditional GANs.…”
Section: Multi-stage Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [157], also the authors based on MC-GAN, introduced a model to produce high resolution images by adding the StackGAN to generator. Olabiyi et al [158] proposed an adversarial network to generate multi-turn dialogue answers. The framework is based on conditional GANs.…”
Section: Multi-stage Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several generative model-based methods have been proposed. The Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) was proposed in image generation (Goodfellow et al 2014) and applied to text generation (Yu et al 2017) and dialogue generation (Li et al 2017;Xu et al 2018;Olabiyi et al 2018). Currently, training with GAN for dialogue generation is very unstable and requires pre-training.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BLEU BLEU-n calculates the percentage of n-gram matching between all of the generated sentences and all of the reference sentences (Papineni et al 2002). We calculated the corpus-level BLEU-1 and BLEU-2 scores that measure the degree of unigram and up to bigram matching.…”
Section: Evaluation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing dialogue systems are broken into two major categories, open-domain dialogue systems, which focus on non-task related conversations, and task-oriented dialogue systems, which focus on user task completion. A typical open-domain system uses an end-to-end neural architecture often trained with input Preprint and output utterances from human-to-human conversations (Sutskever, Vinyals, and Le 2014;Serban et al 2016Serban et al , 2017Olabiyi et al 2018Zhang et al 2019). While open-domain systems are optimized for engaging in human-like conversation, they lack any inherent ability to interface with any other systems on behalf of their conversation partner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%