2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-014-9828-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multibeam Acoustic Detection of Fish and Water Column Targets at High-Flow Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, not many studies of underwater turbulence and cavitation have been done using multibeam sonar (MBS) or dual-beam sonar (DBS) systems. Few studies showed that multi-, dual-and split-beam sonar systems can be used to observe and measure turbulence induced by cavitation of transiting ships, for example, Soloviev et al [5] used a 3D multibeam with an operating frequency of 375 kHz to study the wake of ships and measured the wake of ships using multifrequency-multibeam sonar systems, while Melvin and Cochrane [25] used a set of three sonar systems, one split-beam (120 kHz) and two multibeam sonar systems (200 kHz and 500 kHz) to detect turbulent flow. This work will complement previous work done by the above-mentioned authors (Soloviev et al [5], and Melvin and Cochrane [25]), and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not many studies of underwater turbulence and cavitation have been done using multibeam sonar (MBS) or dual-beam sonar (DBS) systems. Few studies showed that multi-, dual-and split-beam sonar systems can be used to observe and measure turbulence induced by cavitation of transiting ships, for example, Soloviev et al [5] used a 3D multibeam with an operating frequency of 375 kHz to study the wake of ships and measured the wake of ships using multifrequency-multibeam sonar systems, while Melvin and Cochrane [25] used a set of three sonar systems, one split-beam (120 kHz) and two multibeam sonar systems (200 kHz and 500 kHz) to detect turbulent flow. This work will complement previous work done by the above-mentioned authors (Soloviev et al [5], and Melvin and Cochrane [25]), and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sound is an important guiding sense for marine animals such as dolphins, whales, seals, and fish [1][2][3][4]17]. Depending on the species, marine animals have a broad band of frequencies that cover frequencies from 0.01 to 200 kHz [1][2][3][4]17].…”
Section: Overview Of Sonar Technology In Use On Uu Monitoring Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the species, marine animals have a broad band of frequencies that cover frequencies from 0.01 to 200 kHz [1][2][3][4]17]. Therefore, anthropogenic noise with broadband frequencies from 0.01 kHz up to above 2 GHz may disturb the marine environment.…”
Section: Overview Of Sonar Technology In Use On Uu Monitoring Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viehman and Zydlewski () relied on manual processing of acoustic camera data employing a frame‐by‐frame analysis for fish identification, characterization, and behavioral interpretation. Similarly in the echosounder work of Melvin and Cochrane (), the identification of fish and isolation of turbulence effects were based on the authors' experience. In the mobile surveys of Jacques () and Jacques and Horne (), the standard school detection algorithm used in Echoview (Myriax Software, v.5.4.91) and based on the work of Barange () was employed to identify turbulent features as apparent “schools” that intersect a line three meters from the echosounder transducers mounted on the ship.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tidal channels are some of the most dynamic and challenging environments for hydroacoustic work, and have led to the rise of many recent innovative approaches in data collection and analysis using moving vessels (Jacques 2014;Melvin and Cochrane 2015), moored boats , and bottom-mounted platforms (Jacques 2014;Wiesebron 2015;Williamson et al 2015). Although ship based echosounder surveys are the general approach in fisheries research for most applications, the use of stationary platforms can have distinct advantages (Joslin et al 2014;Williamson et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%