2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter Analysis of Advanced Stage Grade 3A Follicular Lymphoma Outcomes by Frontline Treatment Regimen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were reproduced in the small group of patients (n = 27) that received anthracycline‐containing regimens as first‐line therapy. A recent study in United States analysed grade 3A FL patients (n = 103) treated with (n = 65) or without (n = 8) anthracyclines and bendamustine (n = 30). TTF, PFS and OS showed no differences between anthracyclines chemotherapy and bendamustine‐containing regimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results were reproduced in the small group of patients (n = 27) that received anthracycline‐containing regimens as first‐line therapy. A recent study in United States analysed grade 3A FL patients (n = 103) treated with (n = 65) or without (n = 8) anthracyclines and bendamustine (n = 30). TTF, PFS and OS showed no differences between anthracyclines chemotherapy and bendamustine‐containing regimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the approach and survival of grade 3A FL (G3AFL) remain unclear and few data exist on the specific outcome of this precise histology since the introduction of rituximab. Some studies suggest a pattern of continuous relapses, and others suggest a plateau in survival curves in these G3AFL patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ICC, the consensus was to retain the morphological grading of FL, as defined in the WHO-HAEM4, although it remains unclear whether clinically the grade 3A differs from grades 1 and 2 [ 60 ]. Conversely, patients with grade 3B FL are usually treated as DLBCL [ 61 , 62 ].…”
Section: Mature B-cell Neoplasmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grades 1 and 2 are considered as indolent (slow-growing), whereas grade 3B has an aggressive course and is managed as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) ( 4 , 5 ). However, the optimal treatment for grade 3A FL is controversial ( 6 , 7 ). Grade 3A FL has been suggested to be on the same continuum as grades 1 and 2 ( 8 ), and the contrasting findings revealed that gene expression profiling demonstrates a close relationship between FL 3A and 3B, but distinct from grades 1 and 2 ( 9 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%