Purpose:The interaction between mivacurium and inhaled anesthetics is known, with the exception of xenon. We compared the pharmacodynamics of mivacurium during xenon anesthesia vs total iv anesthesia with propofol.Methods: This randomized controlled trial was carried out in the Aachen University Hospital. Forty-two adult patients ASA I or II, aged 18 to 60 yr, were randomized to receive either xenon or propofol anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and remifentanil in both groups (each n = 21). The xenon group received xenon via facemask until an end-expiratory concentration of 60% was reached for one minute. Meanwhile, the acceleromyograph was calibrated and a train-of-four stimulation of the adductor pollicis muscle was started. After stabilization of the signal for five minutes, a single bolus of 0.16 mg·kg -1 mivacurium was injected. Anesthesia was maintained with xenon and remifentanil or with propofol and remifentanil.Results: There were no significant differences between groups with respect to onset time (xenon 180 ± 64 vs propofol 195 ± 77 sec; P = 0.39), duration (xenon 16.18 ± 4.97 vs propofol 15.68 ± 6.17 min; P = 0.73), recovery index (xenon 5.63 ± 2.48 vs propofol 5.73 ± 2.12 min; P = 0.42) and clinical recovery (xenon 8.75 ± 2.57 vs propofol 9.28 ± 2.28 min; P = 0.22).
Conclusion:We conclude that the neuromuscular blocking effects of mivacurium are similar when given during propofol vs xenon anesthesia. (xénon 180 ± 64 vs propofol 195 ± 77 s ; P = 0,39), à sa durée (xénon 16,18 ± 4,97 vs propofol 15,68 ± 6,17 min ; P = 0,73), à l'indice de récupération (xénon 5,63 ± 2,48 vs propofol 5,73 ± 2,12 min ; P = 0,42) et à la récupération clinique (xénon 8,75 ± 2,57 vs propofol 9,28 ± 2,28 min ; P = 0,22).
Objectif : L'interaction entre le mivacurium et les anesthésiques
Résultats : Il n'y a pas eu de différence intergroupe significative quant au délai d'installation du bloc
Conclusion : Les effets neuromusculaires bloquants du mivacurium sont similaires pendant l'anesthésie au propofol ou au xénon.T HE combination of a short-acting opioid and neuromuscular blocking drug, such as remifentanil and mivacurium, allow rapid emergence and recovery from anesthesia. 1 On the other hand, it is well known that most inhaled anesthetics variably prolong and enhance the effects of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs, compared to total iv anesthesia. 2-4 Xenon, a rediscovered inhaled anesthetic with an extremely low blood-gas solubility of 0.115 to 0.14 5 and a minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of 63 to 71%, 6,7 has proven its clinical safety and efficacy in the past. 8 With its ecological and pharmacological qualities, xenon is an interesting alternative to other inhaled anesthetics. The combination of a short-acting opioid, a short duration