2021
DOI: 10.33963/kp.a2021.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicenter Registry of Subcutaneous Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations — preliminary report

Abstract: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the first implantation of an S-ICD in Poland in October 2014, the procedure has been successfully introduced to clinical practice. No early or late complications have been observed so far [34][35][36]. The experience of our department is similar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Since the first implantation of an S-ICD in Poland in October 2014, the procedure has been successfully introduced to clinical practice. No early or late complications have been observed so far [34][35][36]. The experience of our department is similar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Registry A was a multicenter query reporting data of 18 patients from 5 centers that pioneered S-ICD implantations in Poland [6]. Registry B is a nationwide initiative held by the Heart Rhythm Section of the Polish Cardiac Society [7], and 16 centers performing S-ICD implantations report data of subsequent patients undergoing implantation or exchange of the device. The analysis comprised only 144 patients from Registry B undergoing first-time implantation of the system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median MLHFQ total score was 24 (9-41) for S-ICD and 28 (14-43) for TV-ICD (P = 0.83). For the mental and physical dimensions, the median score was 6 (1-12) and 8.5 (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) for S-ICD, respectively, where-as for TV-ICD: 5 (1-10) and 12 (6-17) (S-ICD vs. TV-ICD: P = 0.50 and P = 0.65).…”
Section: Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 98%