ObjectiveTo determine whether age, height, weight and BMI are associated with the levator urethra gap measurement, and whether these factors confound the relationship between LUG and symptoms and signs of POP.MethodsRetrospective study of women seen at a tertiary urogynecology unit between January 2020 and December 2021. Postprocessing of saved ultrasound volume data was utilised to measure the levator‐ urethra gap, blinded against all other data. This measurement was tested for its association with organ descent and hiatal area, and height, weight and body mass index were investigated for any potential confounding effect.ResultsThe 624 women seen during the inclusion period presented mostly with stress urinary incontinence (448, 72%), urgency urinary incontinence (469, 75%) and/ or prolapse (338, 54%). Mean age at assessment was 58 (range, 20‐94) years, mean height was 163 (range, 142‐182) cm, mean weight 80 (41‐ 153) kg, mean BMI was 30 (17‐65) kg/m2. LUG measurements could be obtained in 613 women, resulting in 12*613= 7356 measurements. The average LUG in individual women was 2.35 cm on the right and 2.32 cm on the left (n.s.), for an average of 2.34 cm (SD 0.63) overall. Mean LUG was associated with symptoms and signs of prolapse, both on POPQ and on imaging, but not with height (P= 0.36), weight (P= 0.2) or BMI (P= 0.09).ConclusionLevator‐ urethra gap measurements do not seem to be associated with height, weight or BMI in our population, obviating the need for individualisation of LUG. However, this does not exclude interethnic variability of this biometric measure.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.