2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06090-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the safety in the first 12 h, efficacy and maternal satisfaction of a double balloon catheter and prostaglandin pessary for induction of labour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we found that the carrot juice with carotenoids compounds group had lower labor pain after an 8-week intervention compared to the control group. In addition, a previous study found that carotenoids had a strong inhibitory effect on prostaglandin ( 25 ); in fact, prostaglandin has an impact on the pain experienced during labor ( 26 , 27 ). Carotenoids was significantly correlated with pain and antidepressant in Rats with fibromyalgia models ( 28 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the present study, we found that the carrot juice with carotenoids compounds group had lower labor pain after an 8-week intervention compared to the control group. In addition, a previous study found that carotenoids had a strong inhibitory effect on prostaglandin ( 25 ); in fact, prostaglandin has an impact on the pain experienced during labor ( 26 , 27 ). Carotenoids was significantly correlated with pain and antidepressant in Rats with fibromyalgia models ( 28 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the Cochrane analysis [ 19 ] , a balloon catheter probably reduces the rate of uterine hyperstimulation combined with FHR (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18–0.67), rate of serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25–0.93) and may slightly reduce the rate of aneonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65–1.04). A recent trial conducted by Grace et al published in 2021 [ 15 ] reported that the rates of uterine hyperstimulation and fetal distress were lower in DBC group than vaginal prostaglandin group in the first 12 h. However, a multicentre randomized controlled trial in Australian [ 10 ] showed that there were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcome variables (18.6% vs. 25.8%; RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.51–1.02; p = 0.070) or in the rate of meconium stained liquor (12.6% vs. 11.2%, p = 0.647) between DBC group and dinoprostone group, but uterine hyperstimulation occurred exclusively in the dinoprostone group (3.0% versus 0%; p = 0.029). Considering that maternal factors and fetal intrauterine conditions would affect neonatal outcomes, Diguisto et al [ 9 ] observed no difference in the rate of cesarean delivery due to nonreassuring fetal status for prolonged pregnancies between DBC group and dinoprostone group (5.8% vs. 5.3%, 95% CI 2.1–3.1%, p = 0.70).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insertion to active labor is defined as the time from placing the DBC or applying dinoprostone to the start of regular contractions. Uterine hyperstimulation is defined as contractions more than 5 in 10 min for more than 20 min or contractions lasting more than 2 min in duration [ 15 ]. Fetal distress is defined as the symptoms that endanger the health and life of the fetus in utero due to acute or chronic hypoxia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Cochrane analysis[18], a balloon catheter probably reduces the rate of uterine hyperstimulation combined with FHR (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.67), rate of serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.93) and may slightly reduce the rate of aneonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65-1.04). A recent trial conducted by Grace et al published in 2021 [24] reported that the rates of uterine hyperstimulation and foetal distress were lower in DBC group than vaginal prostaglandin group in the rst 12 h. However, a multicentre randomized controlled trial in Australian [10] showed that there were no statistically signi cant differences in the primary outcome variables (a composite neonatal measure comprising nursery admission, intubation/cardiac compressions, acidaemia, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, seizure, infection, pulmonary hypertension, stillbirth or death) and or in the rate of meconium stained liquor (12.6% vs 11.2%, P = 0.647)between DBC group and dinoprostone group (18.6% vs 25.8%; RR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.51-1.02; P = 0.070),but uterine hyperstimulation occurred exclusively in the dinoprostone group (3.0% versus 0%; P = 0.029). Considering that maternal factors and fetal intrauterine conditions would affect neonatal outcomes, Diguisto et al [9] observed no difference in the rate of cesarean delivery due to nonreassuring fetal status for prolonged pregnancies between DBC group and dinoprostone group (5.8% vs 5.3%,95% CI − 2.1-3.1%, p = 0.70).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%