2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicomponent ionic crystals of diltiazem with dicarboxylic acids toward understanding the structural aspects driving the drug-release

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is expected that in crystal structures efficiently packed, the solubilization process of the API tends to be lower. 47 When we compared the cumulative framework energies between adjacent molecules that appear within a radius of 3.8 Å from the ionic pairs MET + ⋯anion − and divide by the number of interactions (see Table 3), it is noted that the MET–SAC salt has the highest value (−14.22 kJ mol −1 ) followed by the salts MET–MAL (−11.97 kJ mol −1 ), MET–MLN (−10.20 kJ mol −1 ) and MET–HCl (−7.80 kJ mol −1 ). Notably, these energy values are inversely correlated with the salt's solubilities (see Section 3.7), indicating that for the lowest solubility salt (MET–SAC) the molecules have experienced a slightly more crowded crystalline environment than other MET salts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is expected that in crystal structures efficiently packed, the solubilization process of the API tends to be lower. 47 When we compared the cumulative framework energies between adjacent molecules that appear within a radius of 3.8 Å from the ionic pairs MET + ⋯anion − and divide by the number of interactions (see Table 3), it is noted that the MET–SAC salt has the highest value (−14.22 kJ mol −1 ) followed by the salts MET–MAL (−11.97 kJ mol −1 ), MET–MLN (−10.20 kJ mol −1 ) and MET–HCl (−7.80 kJ mol −1 ). Notably, these energy values are inversely correlated with the salt's solubilities (see Section 3.7), indicating that for the lowest solubility salt (MET–SAC) the molecules have experienced a slightly more crowded crystalline environment than other MET salts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a structural point of view, molecules efficiently packed in the solid-state are subject to a higher contribution of stabilizing interaction forces, hampering the solubilization process. 79 For these evaluations, the simultaneous use of EF and HS tools allows to access the magnitude/topology of these interaction energies and the map of atom⋯atom contacts between molecules in the crystal environment. For the EPR solid forms considered herein, it is noted that the pure EPR ( E _ framework = −21.87 kJ mol −1 ) is more stable than the cocrystal EPR-CAF ( E _ framework = −17.41 kJ mol −1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many times, undesired technical properties can hinder the market of a drug with suitable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and the correct choice of a solid form rises as the only alternative to overcome them. Flowability, compactability, compressibility, tablet ability, and hygroscopicity are some examples of technical properties defining certain crystal forms to be marketed. Nowadays, the investigation of how drug technical characteristics can be modulated by the structure and presence of coformers in the solid state goes beyond the academy. Many patents of technically improved drug crystal forms have been deposited by great pharmaceutical companies, such as Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Abbott, among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%