Geophysics and Geosequestration 2019
DOI: 10.1017/9781316480724.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicomponent Seismic Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that a rock physics model used for converting the Kimberlina model into the P‐wave velocity model is based on the average of the upper and lower Hashin–Shtrikman bounds (Mavko et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2019), Thus, the seismic training data are sensitive to a broader range of CO 2 saturation even at high CO 2 saturation levels. However, in practice, if a rock's physical relationship between P‐wave velocity and CO 2 saturation is close to the lower Hashin–Shtrikman bound, the sensitivity of the seismic imaging to the high concentration of CO 2 saturation would diminish (Davis et al., 2019; Gasperikova & Li, 2021; Kim et al., 2010). The non‐seismic methods such as EM and gravity methods can help to fill the gap.…”
Section: Deep Learning Multiphysics Imaging Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that a rock physics model used for converting the Kimberlina model into the P‐wave velocity model is based on the average of the upper and lower Hashin–Shtrikman bounds (Mavko et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2019), Thus, the seismic training data are sensitive to a broader range of CO 2 saturation even at high CO 2 saturation levels. However, in practice, if a rock's physical relationship between P‐wave velocity and CO 2 saturation is close to the lower Hashin–Shtrikman bound, the sensitivity of the seismic imaging to the high concentration of CO 2 saturation would diminish (Davis et al., 2019; Gasperikova & Li, 2021; Kim et al., 2010). The non‐seismic methods such as EM and gravity methods can help to fill the gap.…”
Section: Deep Learning Multiphysics Imaging Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geological carbon storage (GCS) is a viable option for reducing CO 2 emissions into the atmosphere (Benson & Cole, 2008; Davis et al., 2019; Metz et al., 2005; Ringrose, 2020). A large amount of CO 2 is captured from fossil‐fuel power stations and other major industrial CO 2 sources and is injected into depleted reservoirs or saline aquifers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%