The Palgrave Handbook of Ethnicity 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0242-8_139-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiculturalism and Citizenship in the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiculturalism combines the recognition of distinctiveness of cultures, national unity or social cohesion, and nondiscrimination (Boog, 2014). Multiculturalism is favored more strongly by minority youth than by Dutch majority youth, who may even perceive multiculturalism as threatening to the benefits of their relatively more favorable social position (van Geel & Vedder, 2011; Verkuyten & Martinovic, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiculturalism combines the recognition of distinctiveness of cultures, national unity or social cohesion, and nondiscrimination (Boog, 2014). Multiculturalism is favored more strongly by minority youth than by Dutch majority youth, who may even perceive multiculturalism as threatening to the benefits of their relatively more favorable social position (van Geel & Vedder, 2011; Verkuyten & Martinovic, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being aware of an ingroup member’s having had a negative experience with an outgroup member may influence outgroup attitudes in the same way that the awareness of an indirect positive outgroup contact experience does. Observing or knowing about unfriendly or even hostile intergroup interactions between the majority Dutch and minority Muslims is far from uncommon in the Netherlands (Boog, 2014; Savelkoul, Scheepers, Tolsma, & Hagendoorn, 2011). The current study includes positive and negative, direct as well as extended, intergroup contact experiences and aims to investigate their relationship with adolescents’ intergroup attitude.…”
Section: Positive and Negative Contact Effects Direct And Extendedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stronger role of the Affective dimension in the immigrant groups may reflect anger about negative experiences, such as discrimination, particularly in the non-Western immigrant group (Berry & Vedder, 2016), or not being able to live up to parental expectations, more characteristic of Western immigrant youth (Vogels, Gijsberts, & Den Draak, 2014). Higher scores on the items regarding lack of remorse and callousness may reflect youths’ attempts to cope with this anger and avoid that others see their anger, because this might attract negative attention (i.e., further discrimination or rejection; Boog, 2014; Vedder, Wenink, & Van Geel, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%