2012
DOI: 10.3102/1076998610396900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidimensional Assessment of Value Added by Teachers to Real-World Outcomes

Abstract: Measuring teacher effectiveness is challenging since no direct estimate exists; teacher effectiveness can be measured only indirectly through student responses. Traditional value-added assessment (VAA) models generally attempt to estimate the value that an individual teacher adds to students' knowledge as measured by scores on successive administrations of a standardized test. Such responses, however, do not reflect the long-term contribution of a teacher to real-world student outcomes such as graduation, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, studies should address issues related to establishing a "good" student baseline, identifying minimum data requirements, and selecting appropriate measures of student success. Additionally, the proposed methods should be extended for use with a multidimensional VAM (Broatch and Lohr 2012) to simultaneously estimate the effects of a program on student achievement test scores and "real-world" outcomes, such as college entry. By using the multidimensional model in this context, professional development programs would have methodology to more broadly define their effects on student success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, studies should address issues related to establishing a "good" student baseline, identifying minimum data requirements, and selecting appropriate measures of student success. Additionally, the proposed methods should be extended for use with a multidimensional VAM (Broatch and Lohr 2012) to simultaneously estimate the effects of a program on student achievement test scores and "real-world" outcomes, such as college entry. By using the multidimensional model in this context, professional development programs would have methodology to more broadly define their effects on student success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, RealVAMS uses sparse matrix routines provided by Matrix (Bates and Maechler, 2015). Broatch and Lohr (2012) use the pseudo-likelihood approach to obtain approximations to the maximum likelihood estimators; they then adopt the penalized quasi-likelihood approach in SAS PROC GLIMMIX (SAS Institute Inc., 2008) to approximate maximum likelihood estimates (Breslow and Clayton, 1993;Wolfinger and O'Connell, 1993). However, the SAS estimation in presented in Broatch and Lohr (2012) is limited to less than 30 random effects, which is not feasible or efficient for a large scale model.…”
Section: Normal Multimembership Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally developed in Broatch and Lohr (2012), the RealVAMS model is a multivariate generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) that extends previous theory by allowing the simultaneous joint modeling of continuous and binary outcomes within a value-added framework. Although the model may be used in a variety of contexts (e.g., sports, medicine, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At worst, the (fully exponential) Laplace approximation presents an improvement over PQL in this setting, even if consistency is not guaranteed. PQL is widely used -such as in SAS PROC GLIMMIX -despite the the fact that it produces potentially biased estimates, because PQL makes some problems computationally feasible that otherwise would not be (Broatch and Lohr, 2011). Even the bias-corrected PQL of Lin and Breslow (1996) is inconsistent (Jiang, 2007).…”
Section: Approximation Errormentioning
confidence: 99%