2020
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202008533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiexcitonic Triplet Pair Generation in Oligoacene Dendrimers as Amorphous Solid‐State Miniatures

Abstract: Singlet fission in organic semiconducting materials has attracted great attention for the potential application in photovoltaic devices. Research interests have been concentrated on identifying working mechanisms of coherent SF processes in crystalline solids as ultrafast SF is hailed for efficient multiexciton generation. However, as long lifetime of multiexcitonic triplet pair in amorphous solids facilitates the decorrelation process for triplet exciton extractions, a precise examination of incoherent SF pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
41
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
5
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…7,8 Although this phenomenon has become a hot topic in chemical research, the families of SF capable materials remain relatively limited 9 and several mechanistic details of the SF process remain unclear. [10][11][12] Notably, the inuence of intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) on the SF has been the object of recent investigations carried out on dimers of tetracene, 13 pentacene, [14][15][16][17][18] terrylenediimide, [19][20][21][22][23] diketopyrrolopyrrole, [24][25][26][27][28] on tetracene and perylenediimide oligomers or dendrimers [29][30][31] and on push-pull polymers. [32][33][34] These studies generally consider either the effect of solvent polarity or the effect of tuning the electron donor/ acceptor group strength on the SF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Although this phenomenon has become a hot topic in chemical research, the families of SF capable materials remain relatively limited 9 and several mechanistic details of the SF process remain unclear. [10][11][12] Notably, the inuence of intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) on the SF has been the object of recent investigations carried out on dimers of tetracene, 13 pentacene, [14][15][16][17][18] terrylenediimide, [19][20][21][22][23] diketopyrrolopyrrole, [24][25][26][27][28] on tetracene and perylenediimide oligomers or dendrimers [29][30][31] and on push-pull polymers. [32][33][34] These studies generally consider either the effect of solvent polarity or the effect of tuning the electron donor/ acceptor group strength on the SF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism for the generation of TT is well-studied in both intermolecular (xSF) (e.g., solid-state) and intramolecular SF (ISF) (covalently linked dimers). In both cases, a strong electronic coupling between two chromophores accelerates the rate constants of TT generation and the corresponding reverse reaction: triplet–triplet annihilation (TTA). , In xSF, ultrafast SF within a few picosecond time scale was observed because of strong electronic coupling with coherent SF from S 1 to a vibronically excited 1 (TT) and direct SF from the upper excited singlet state (S n ) to 1 (TT). , These features are also highly related with the hybridization of wave functions of S 1 , T 1 , and the charge-transfer (CT) excited states …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent benchmark study on electronic excitation energy and exciton’s behavior show that the long-range-corrected (LRC) density functionals perform well . Among a various type of LRC functionals, we selected the CAM-B3LYP-D functional on the basis of the previous successful application to investigate the SF process in covalently linked PBI dimers and acene dendrimeric structures, , and similar excitation energy compared to ωB97X-D, which is the widely employed functional to compute SF-relevant electronic structures. The binding energy is defined as the energy difference between a dimer and two monomers; therefore, negative signs indicate a favorable interaction.…”
Section: Quantum Chemical Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%