1979
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197901000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifactorial Probit Analysis of Mortality in Burned Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
1
14

Year Published

1981
1981
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
30
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, as the objective of the present study was to finetune the model developed by Ryan and colleagues 13 , the database did not include the data necessary for comparison with more complex prediction models developed by other investigators 9,10,14,19 . However, the findings suggested the limited advantage of formulas that are more complex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, as the objective of the present study was to finetune the model developed by Ryan and colleagues 13 , the database did not include the data necessary for comparison with more complex prediction models developed by other investigators 9,10,14,19 . However, the findings suggested the limited advantage of formulas that are more complex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low mortality in our population could be attributed to several factors: (1) the dominance of young patients; (2) referral of all patients within hours of the accident; (3) treatment of all patients by trained staff in a specialized burn unit rather than in general surgical wards; and (4) a total burn surface area of less than 15% in 66% of all patients (330 of 501). The error inherent in assessing prognosis based on independent examination of variables rather than in combination has been previously emphasized [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion criteria involved the presence of any preexisting metabolic disorders and artificial ventilation with an inspiratory O 2 concentration of more than 60%. Measurements of REE above this limit are less reliable.The patients were classified according to the mortality index of Zawacki et al, which accounts for factors relevant to the trauma, such as age, BSAB, third degree BSAB, and the patient's pulmonary status (prior pulmonary disease, abnormal PaO 2 , airway edema) [10]. We set random limits to classify the groups:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%