MultiFi

Grubert, Jens; Heinisch, Matthias; Quigley, Aaron; Schmalstieg, Dieter

doi:10.1145/2702123.2702331

Cited by 91 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Existing toolkits have explored cross device interaction with combinations of mobile devices [13,37,41,47,48], mobile/desktop devices [15,28,32,34], mobile/display wall devices [1,21] and wearables [2,10,17]. Alternative approaches have focused on the development of conceptual frameworks [23,39].…”

Section: Toolkits and Middlewarementioning

confidence: 99%

AdaM

Park

Gebhardt

Rädle

et al. 2018

Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Optimization & Real-time Adaptation Figure 1. Given a graphical user interface (left), AdaM automatically decides which UI elements should be displayed on each device in real-time. Our optimization is designed for multi-user scenarios and considers user roles and preferences, device access restrictions and device characteristics. ABSTRACTDeveloping cross-device multi-user interfaces (UIs) is a challenging problem. There are numerous ways in which content and interactivity can be distributed. However, good solutions must consider multiple users, their roles, their preferences and access rights, as well as device capabilities. Manual and rule-based solutions are tedious to create and do not scale to larger problems nor do they adapt to dynamic changes, such as users leaving or joining an activity. In this paper, we cast the problem of UI distribution as an assignment problem and propose to solve it using combinatorial optimization. We present a mixed integer programming formulation which allows realtime applications in dynamically changing collaborative settings. It optimizes the allocation of UI elements based on device capabilities, user roles, preferences, and access rights. We present a proof-of-concept designer-in-the-loop tool, allowing for quick solution exploration. Finally, we compare our approach to traditional paper prototyping in a lab study.

show abstract

Section: Toolkits and Middlewarementioning

confidence: 99%

AdaM

Park

Gebhardt

Rädle

et al. 2018

Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The merger of the classifications between open and axial coding produced the categories and sub categories we detail in the following sections. In addition to a literature survey, we also reflected on our own experiences in researching multi-device environments [3,8,13]. In the subsequent sections, we have grouped challenges into four top-level categories of design, technological/development, social and perceptual/physiological challenges.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Middle: interaction between a smartphone and smartwatch (image courtesy of Chen et al) [2]. Right: Interaction between head-mounted display and smartphone [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These environments consist of multiple interactive and coordinated devices, typically displays, with at least one mobile or wearable component (see Figure 1). We see recent interest in the research community (e.g., [1,2,3,5]). However, while, for example, multi-display interaction is already common in stationary scenarios, to date we see less cross-device and multidisplay interaction [6,7], which include mobile or wearable components employed outside of the laboratory.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Challenges in mobile multi-device ecosystems

2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coordinated multi-display environments from the desktop, second-screen to gigapixel display walls are increasingly common. Personal and intimate mobile and wearable devices such as head-mounted displays, smartwatches, smartphones and tablets are rarely part of such multi-device ecosystems. With this paper, we contribute to a better understanding about factors that impede the creation and use of such mobile multi-device ecosystems. We base our findings on literature research and an expert survey. Specifically, we present grounded challenges relevant for the design, development and use of mobile multi-device environments.

show abstract

“…Today, we see the emergence of another range of more mobile and intimate display technology, from wrist-worn smartwatches and health devices (eg. fitbit or Microsoft Band as shown in Figure 4) to headmounted displays [2] (see Figures 2 and 5) or personal devices such as smartphones and tablets. A motivating question for us here is, can these disparate forms of displays be coupled and coordinated to realise "proximate display environments", with on and around the body interaction as shown in Figure 1 from [2]?…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceptual and Social Challenges in Body Proximate Display Ecosystems

Quigley

Grubert

2015

Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction With Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coordinated multi-display environments from the desktop, second-screen to gigapixel display walls are increasingly common. Personal and intimate display devices such as head-mounted displays, smartwatches, smartphones and tablets are rarely part of such a multi-display ecosystem. This presents an opportunity to realise "body proximate" display environments, employing on and around the body displays. These can be formed by combining multiple handheld, head-mounted, wrist-worn or other personal or appropriated displays. However, such an ecosystem encapsulating evermore interaction points, is not yet well understood. For example, does this trap the user in an "interaction bubble" even more than interaction with individual displays such as smartphones? Within this paper, we investigate the perceptual and social challenges that could inhibit the adoption and acceptance of interactive proximate display ecosystems. We conclude with a series of research questions raised in the consideration of such environments.

show abstract

MultiFi

Cited by 91 publications

References 34 publications

AdaM

AdaM

Challenges in mobile multi-device ecosystems

Perceptual and Social Challenges in Body Proximate Display Ecosystems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About