2009
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifocal intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia in the retroperitoneum and spine: A case report and review of the literature

Abstract: The authors present a unique case of intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia (IPEH) localized in the renal hilum, retroperitoneum, and spine in a patient with Wegener granulomatosis. IPEH rarely occurs in the abdomen or spine with few cases reported in the literature. No case has been reported of IPEH involving both the retroperitoneum and spine. In our case, MR imaging revealed enhancing masses in the right renal hilum and retroperitoneum as well as multiple focal enhancing lesions throughout the spin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive staining with WT1 in our case of Masson tumor may reflect the proliferative endothelial reaction in this lesion. 14 We only had 3 cases of vascular malformations with positive WT1 immunostaining in our study: two targetoid hemosiderotic hemangiomas and one verrucous hemangioma (Table II). There is still a debate about the origin of targetoid hemosiderotic hemangioma.…”
Section: Wt1 Was First Identified As a Tumor Suppressor Involved In Tmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The positive staining with WT1 in our case of Masson tumor may reflect the proliferative endothelial reaction in this lesion. 14 We only had 3 cases of vascular malformations with positive WT1 immunostaining in our study: two targetoid hemosiderotic hemangiomas and one verrucous hemangioma (Table II). There is still a debate about the origin of targetoid hemosiderotic hemangioma.…”
Section: Wt1 Was First Identified As a Tumor Suppressor Involved In Tmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…5,7,9,13,14 Often, the papillae fuse to form an anastomotic vascular pattern that may mimic the appearance of angiosarcoma. 3,4,7,9,11,14,[17][18][19] However, in this case, the differential diagnosis can be established on the basis of two important points: (1) angiosarcomas usually occur in different clinical settings and are extravascular with an infi ltrative growth pattern that dissects collagen bundles; (2) in malignant lesions such as angiosarcomas, the endothelial cells display moderate to marked cytologic atypia with prominent mitotic activity, which is not observed in benign lesions such as IPEH. 5,7,20 In this study in particular, one case included a previous report of recurrence, leading us to review the histological features to exclude angiosarcoma and to perform complementary immunohistochemical analyses to verify the proliferative potential of the lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…5 Clinically, the differential diagnosis includes pyogenic granuloma, hemangioma, hematoma, traumatic fi broma, salivary gland tumor, thrombosed vein, mucocele, and nevus, while histologically it can resemble an angiosarcoma. [2][3][4][5]7,8,11,13,14 The best treatment is total excision-biopsy into healthy margins, and the prognosis is usually excellent. 4,5,8,9,13 Few cases of recurrence, which is most often associated with an underlying vascular tumor, have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six cases (40.0%) were located in the renal vein [4,5,6,7,8], five (33.3%) were reported in the gastrointestinal tract [13,14,15,16], two (13.3%) in the adrenal gland [10,11], and one (6.7%) in the liver [12]. An additional case (6.7%) involved multiple lesions located in the renal hilum and the retroperitoneum [9]. Among these patients, 10 (66.7%) were female and 5 (33.3%) male, with a mean age of 38.9 years (range 7-69).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less frequently, IPEH has been documented in the upper respiratory tract, skeletal muscle, urogenital systems, renal and hepatic systems, and rarely in the gastrointestinal tract. To date, 14 cases of IPEH arising within the abdominal cavity have been reported [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16], and only 4 cases involved the gastrointestinal tract [13,14,15,16]. In each of the 4 cases in which IPEH involved the gastrointestinal tract, a primary pathologic etiology was elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%