2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2021.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifocal retroperitoneal and pelvic PEComas mimicking liposarcoma: A case report and review of literature

Abstract: Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComa) constitute a rare, but increasingly recognized family of seemingly distinct mesenchymal tumors which can occur in any part of the body. Due to their rarity, radiological descriptions of PEComas in the current literature are few and non-specific, making diagnosis difficult, though some common imaging features have been reported. We present an unusual case of multifocal retroperitoneal and pelvic PEComas, mimicking liposarcoma, subsequently treated with open surge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some primary sites of PEComa include the retroperitoneum, uterus, vulva, gastrointestinal tract (oesophagus, stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, colon, rectum), heart, breast, urinary bladder, abdominal wall, skin, mesentery, oral cavity, pancreas and liver. Women are more commonly affected than men, and these tumours are more frequently seen in the fourth and fifth decades of life 8. Imaging studies are not sufficiently sensitive to make the diagnosis of PEComas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some primary sites of PEComa include the retroperitoneum, uterus, vulva, gastrointestinal tract (oesophagus, stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, colon, rectum), heart, breast, urinary bladder, abdominal wall, skin, mesentery, oral cavity, pancreas and liver. Women are more commonly affected than men, and these tumours are more frequently seen in the fourth and fifth decades of life 8. Imaging studies are not sufficiently sensitive to make the diagnosis of PEComas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is characterised by a copious amount of intratumoral fat density, a renal parenchymal defect, encapsulated margins, and enlarged/aneurysmal intralesional blood vessels [71]. Radiologic reviews of retroperitoneal tumours where benign AML is a consideration should be performed at a sarcoma referral centre, as AML can look similar to well-differentiated or dedifferentiated LPS or PEComa-NOS on imaging [Figure 1] [71][72][73]. This is due to the scarce or absent intratumoral fat of benign epithelioid AML on imaging.…”
Section: Differentiating Malignant Pecoma-nos From Benign Amlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, tumours that cannot clearly be diagnosed as AML or PEComa-NOS on imaging require retroperitoneal coaxial core-needle biopsy for diagnosis [70]. Similarly, some LPS (especially well-differentiated LPS) may look similar to AML, necessitating biopsy and testing for fluorescence in situ hybridization amplification of the MDM2 and CDK4 genes for LPS diagnosis [71,73,74]. Importantly, even on biopsy, epithelioid AML resembles renal cell carcinoma, although immunohistochemistry can usually distinguish these entities.…”
Section: Differentiating Malignant Pecoma-nos From Benign Amlmentioning
confidence: 99%