2012
DOI: 10.1190/tle31101146.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifocusing-based multiple attenuation

Abstract: It is widely considered that, in regions with significant geologic complexity, methods which work directly in the depth domain are superior to methods which operate on prestack time data. So, for example, velocity analysis using depth migration and residual moveout became standard in the industry. The most common depth-velocity analysis attempts to flatten common-image-migrated gathers for main reflectors by measuring depth errors as a function of the offset. At the same time, the fact that most depth-domain a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, MF can be considered as a method for wavefield analysis, which reliably estimates wavefront parameters of each seismic event at each imaging point (Hubral, 1983; Landa et al., 1999). These attributes have broad applications in seismic imaging and interpretation (Berkovitch et al., 2012; Buzlukov & Landa, 2013; Chang, Hu, et al., 2019; Elhaj et al., 2014; Landa et al., 2009, 2013; Schoepp et al., 2015).…”
Section: Review Of Multifocusing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, MF can be considered as a method for wavefield analysis, which reliably estimates wavefront parameters of each seismic event at each imaging point (Hubral, 1983; Landa et al., 1999). These attributes have broad applications in seismic imaging and interpretation (Berkovitch et al., 2012; Buzlukov & Landa, 2013; Chang, Hu, et al., 2019; Elhaj et al., 2014; Landa et al., 2009, 2013; Schoepp et al., 2015).…”
Section: Review Of Multifocusing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%