2018
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b00664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifunctional CdSNPs@ZIF-8: Potential Antibacterial Agent against GFP-Expressing Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus and Efficient Photocatalyst for Degradation of Methylene Blue

Abstract: Multifunctional novel core–shell composites, CdSNPs@ZIF-8, have been synthesized by in situ encapsulation of different amounts of CdSNPs (150, 300, and 500 μL suspension of CdSNPs in methanol) in ZIF-8 at room temperature. These composites have been characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), field emission scanning electron microscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy techniques and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mesoporous size distribution increases the surface area of the samples, which considerably affects the antibacterial properties of the sample. Moreover, based on the BET technique, the sample has a surface area of 800 m 2 /g, which approves the interaction required for the antibacterial performance of the Zn-MOF sample [41]. Figure 3Cdepicts the SEM image of Zn-MOF having mean particle size of 97 nm.…”
Section: Physicochemical Properties Of Zn-mofmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The mesoporous size distribution increases the surface area of the samples, which considerably affects the antibacterial properties of the sample. Moreover, based on the BET technique, the sample has a surface area of 800 m 2 /g, which approves the interaction required for the antibacterial performance of the Zn-MOF sample [41]. Figure 3Cdepicts the SEM image of Zn-MOF having mean particle size of 97 nm.…”
Section: Physicochemical Properties Of Zn-mofmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It is calculated that the potentials of the conduction band and the valence band of SnS 2 are −0.594 and 1.946 eV, and those of 2D‐ZIF‐8 are −1.088 and 3.862 eV, respectively. Due to the large difference in the forbidden band width, SnS 2 is more easily excited under visible light than 2D‐ZIF‐8, electrons in the conduction band of SnS 2 will migrate to 2D‐ZIF‐8, and holes in the valence band of 2D‐ZIF‐8 gather to SnS 2 , as shown in Figure . The electrons collected in the CB of 2D‐ZIF‐8 are sufficient ability to reduce O 2 to form •O 2 – , since the potential of CB (‐1.088 eV) is more negative than the potential of E θ (O 2 /•O 2 – )(−0.33 eV vs. NHE) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the large difference in the forbidden band width, SnS 2 is more easily excited under visible light than 2D-ZIF-8, electrons in the conduction band of SnS 2 will migrate to 2D-ZIF-8, and holes in the valence band of 2D-ZIF-8 gather to SnS 2 , as shown in Figure 8. [62] The electrons collected in the CB of 2D-ZIF-8 are sufficient ability to reduce O 2 to form * O 2 -, since the potential of CB (-1.088 eV) is more negative than the potential of E θ (O 2 / * O 2 -)(À 0.33 eV vs. NHE). [63][64][65] Unfortunately, the holes that gather to the VB of SnS 2 cannot oxidize H 2 O or OH À to * OH owing to the potential of the VB (1.946 eV) is not more positive than the potential of E θ ( * OH/H 2 O)(2.27 eV vs. NHE) and E θ ( * OH/OH À )(2.38 eV vs. NHE).…”
Section: Mechanism Analysis Of Photocatalytic Removal Of Mbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Tet@ZIF-8@HA nanocomposites (TZH) were synthesized as a nanocarrier platform for selective/controlled release 33 of antibiotics in specic regions. According to a literature search, 15,16 although many research groups have investigated ZIF-8 nanocomposites, the instability of MOFs in water and the inherent properties of powder materials may limit their practical application. 17 Due to the inherent powder properties of MOFs, it is difficult for them to fully contact the surface of infected skin to kill bacteria; therefore, the use of MOFs alone is very inefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%