2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-501-5_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multigene Phylogenetic Analyses to Delimit New Species in Fungal Plant Pathogens

Abstract: Supporting the identification of unknown strains or specimens by sequencing a genetic marker commonly used for phylogenetics or DNA barcoding is now standard practice for mycologists and plant pathologists. Does one have a new species when a strain differs by a few base pairs when compared to reference sequences from taxonomically well-characterized species that do not differ morphologically from this new strain? If variation at the intra- and interspecific levels for the locus used for identification is alrea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, biological species recognition is not possible for all fungi and it can be unreliable and misleading in laboratory environments (Harrington 2000;Taylor et al 2000). During the course of the past 25 years, phylogenetic analysis and Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR) has gained acceptance in the recognition of many new taxa that would not have been possible based on other criteria (Bridge et al 2005;Rintoul et al 2012;Taylor et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, biological species recognition is not possible for all fungi and it can be unreliable and misleading in laboratory environments (Harrington 2000;Taylor et al 2000). During the course of the past 25 years, phylogenetic analysis and Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR) has gained acceptance in the recognition of many new taxa that would not have been possible based on other criteria (Bridge et al 2005;Rintoul et al 2012;Taylor et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many cases where closely related species, even morphologically indistinguishable, can differ greatly in their virulence and host specificity, and thus the level of threat they pose to agriculture and forestry. Specific and precise species delimitation of these pathogens is essential for effective disease control and quarantine regulations, and for sustainable management practices in agriculture and forestry (Rintoul et al 2012). However, methods for species delimitation are very limited in many groups, often relying on very limited morphological and cultural characteristics that vary widely during life history and can be easily influenced by nonheritable factors such as environmental conditions and sexual forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, due to stochastic lineage sorting across genomes and ongoing gene flow during speciation, for closely related fungi, one marker is definitely not enough (Dupuis et al 2012). As a consequence, multiple independent loci are required for reliable species delimitation (Rintoul et al 2012). Multilocus data have been successfully applied to delimitate several closely related plant pathogenic ascomycete fungi, for example, in Neurospora (Dettman et al 2003), Fusarium (O'Donnell et al 2004 and Septoria (Verkley et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of species by sequencing a genetic marker has become common practice among mycologists [14,16]. Genealogical concordance phylogenetic species recognition (GCPSR) techniques have been used to identify populations, delineate cryptic species, and document genetic recombination and gene flow in a number of fungal pathogens [9,11,[17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Genotypic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%