1995
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(94)00377-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilayer perceptron in damage detection of bridge structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Szewczyk and Hajela [7] applied an improved counter-propagation neural network to evaluate a reduction in the member sti ness of a frame structure with nine bending elements, by using measured static displacements under prescribed loads. Pandey and Barai [8] detected damage in a bridge truss by applying ANN of multilayer perceptron architectures to numerically simulated data. Using static displacements, natural frequencies and modal shapes, Zhao et al [9] applied a counter-propagation neural network to locate damage in beams and frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Szewczyk and Hajela [7] applied an improved counter-propagation neural network to evaluate a reduction in the member sti ness of a frame structure with nine bending elements, by using measured static displacements under prescribed loads. Pandey and Barai [8] detected damage in a bridge truss by applying ANN of multilayer perceptron architectures to numerically simulated data. Using static displacements, natural frequencies and modal shapes, Zhao et al [9] applied a counter-propagation neural network to locate damage in beams and frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training samples for the RA method are arbitrarily selected from the 81 sample con"gurations for the FF method in Table 2 and are corresponded to samples 3,10,15,20,23,35,52, 58 and 70. The training samples for the HC and LI methods on the other hand are identical to those selected in the previous example as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Update Of the Materials Properties And The Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rhim and Lee [9] examined the feasibility of using NN in conjunction with system identi"cation techniques to detect the existence and to identify the characteristics of damage in composite structures. An application of NN in the damage detection of steel bridge structures was studied by Pandey and Barai [10]. An NN-based approach was presented for the detection of changes in the characteristics of structure-unknown systems [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has caught the interest of most researchers and has today become an essential part of the technology industry, providing a good ground for solving many of the most difficult prediction problems in various areas of engineering applications (Baughman 1995;Guler 2005;Inan et al 2006;Li and Jiao 2002;Moghadassi et al 2009;Mohaghegh 1995;Nascimento et al 2000;Phung and Bouzerdoum 2007;Ü beyli 2009). ANN has also gained vast popularity in solving various Civil Engineering problems (Baughman 1995;Beale and Demuth 2013;Chen et al 1995;Flood and Kartam 1994;Hasancebi and Dumlupınar 2013;Kang and Yoon 1994;Kirkegaard and Rytter 1994;Neaupane and Adhikari 2006;Pandey and Barai 1995;Rafiq et al 2001). Azad et al (2010) proposed the following two-step procedure to predict the residual flexural strength of corroded beams for which the cross-sectional details, material strengths, corrosion activity index I corr T , and diameter of rebar, D were known.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%