2018
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel Analysis of Child and Adolescent Subjective Well‐Being Across 14 Countries: Child‐ and Country‐Level Predictors

Abstract: This study tests an ecological, relationship-based model of children's subjective well-being with 9- to 14-year-old children (n = 25,906) from 14 countries across Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. Children completed the Children's Worlds survey, a self-report measure of contextual and well-being indicators. Multilevel modeling was used to predict children's well-being (life satisfaction and self-image) at two levels, child (age, gender, home context, family relationships, peer relationshi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
93
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
9
93
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, family, school and community significantly affect the levels of children's SWB (Lee and Yoo 2015). The second conclusion is, therefore, that most of the variation in child SWB seems to be explained by differences within countries rather than between countries (Lee and Yoo 2015; Bradshaw and Rees 2017;Klocke et al 2014;Moreno 2017;Looze et al 2018;Bradshaw 2015;Newland et al 2018). The third important conclusion is that the factors that explain this variation at the national level -that is, micro-(individual, home) and meso-level (school, community) factorsand their relative importance in the shaping of child SWB, vary considerably from country to country (Lee and Yoo 2015;Bradshaw and Rees 2017).…”
Section: Explaining Variation In Child Subjective Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, family, school and community significantly affect the levels of children's SWB (Lee and Yoo 2015). The second conclusion is, therefore, that most of the variation in child SWB seems to be explained by differences within countries rather than between countries (Lee and Yoo 2015; Bradshaw and Rees 2017;Klocke et al 2014;Moreno 2017;Looze et al 2018;Bradshaw 2015;Newland et al 2018). The third important conclusion is that the factors that explain this variation at the national level -that is, micro-(individual, home) and meso-level (school, community) factorsand their relative importance in the shaping of child SWB, vary considerably from country to country (Lee and Yoo 2015;Bradshaw and Rees 2017).…”
Section: Explaining Variation In Child Subjective Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…& The quality of relationships between teachers and the student has been found to decrease with age (Bokhorst et al 2010;Demaray and Malecki 2003;Furman and Buhrmester 1992;García-Moya et al 2014). Positive relationships with teachers are related to higher child SWB (Cotterell and Cotterell 2007;García-Moya et al 2014;OECD 2017a;Moore et al 2018;Newland et al 2018;Danielsen et al 2011;Diseth and Samdal 2014), higher satisfaction with school (Samdal et al 1998), lower risk of initiation of health-risk behaviours (McNeely and Falci 2004;Moore et al 2018) and lower risk of mental health problems (Moore et al 2018). & Relationships with school peers are also important.…”
Section: School Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Within the school context, becoming a victim of bullying behavior has become an important risk factors for children's SWB (Turner et al 2014), general adjustment (Felix et al 2009), andlife satisfaction (MacDonald et al 2005;Martin and Huebner 2007;Proctor et al 2009;Valois et al 2006). The significance of the relationship between SWB and objective indicators has also been underscored (Bradshaw et al 2013), and points to the importance of country and cultural comparisons to explain differences across various SWB measures (Dinisman and Ben-Arieh 2015;Newland et al 2019). However, there is a dearth of research focusing on the negative consequences of objective and subjective domains of children's well-being using multilevel methods to account for differences between school experiences.…”
Section: Subjective Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 99%