2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel predictors of smoking initiation among adolescents: Findings from the Minnesota Adolescent Community Cohort (MACC) study

Abstract: Objective To understand how factors at multiple levels of influence impact adolescent smoking initiation. Method Data from the Minnesota Adolescent Community Cohort, a population-based cohort, were analyzed. Adolescents were recruited from randomly selected geopolitical units (GPUs) in Minnesota at ages 12 to 13 (n=1,953), and were surveyed every six months (2000–2006) until 18. The association between baseline social factors and smoking initiation was analyzed using logistic regression. Linear regression wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
30
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
30
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to past studies, we find that frequent communication between parents and children about smoking is largely a risk factor for adolescents' smoking (Goldade et al, 2012;Huver et al, 2006) with frequency of communication negatively associated with self-efficacy (Fearnow et al, 1998). In contrast, anti-smoking advice is found elsewhere to result in lower risk of smoking for adolescents (Chassin et al, 1996;Fearnow et al, 1998;Goldade et al, 2012) albeit some argue that it is frequency rather quality of communication that deters adolescent from smoking (Otten et al, 2007). Ennett (Ennett et al, 2001) suggest that once adolescents start smoking parents tend to pass antismoking advice more frequently to induce smoking cessation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to past studies, we find that frequent communication between parents and children about smoking is largely a risk factor for adolescents' smoking (Goldade et al, 2012;Huver et al, 2006) with frequency of communication negatively associated with self-efficacy (Fearnow et al, 1998). In contrast, anti-smoking advice is found elsewhere to result in lower risk of smoking for adolescents (Chassin et al, 1996;Fearnow et al, 1998;Goldade et al, 2012) albeit some argue that it is frequency rather quality of communication that deters adolescent from smoking (Otten et al, 2007). Ennett (Ennett et al, 2001) suggest that once adolescents start smoking parents tend to pass antismoking advice more frequently to induce smoking cessation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For instance, the finding of increased smoking along with increased antismoking advice can simply be a result of increased advice given towards adolescents that already smoke. In fact, Avenevoli and Merikangas (Avenevoli and Merikangas, 2003) found a bi-directional relationship between parents-child communication/rules and smoking habits, whereby adolescent smoking at baseline could be predicted, by parent-child communication and vice versa (Goldade et al, 2012). Similarly, although smoking behaviour is often found to be correlated among friends and subsequently attributed to be peer effects, it is possible that it is a result of selection of the adolescent into a group that already smokes (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the National Health Survey (2013), the prevalence of cigarette smokers among adults was higher among black (17 . It is worth noting that, among adolescents, the main factors associated with smoking are age, influence of friends, smoking parents with lower educational level, and lack of family supervision 30,32 . With regard to the use of alcohol in the last 30 days and experimentation with alcohol at least once during their lifetime, white adolescents showed higher risk in comparison to brown individuals in the first behavior, and black and brown individuals in the second behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Así mismo, los fumadores reportaron sentir el más alto grado de motivación por el consumo y tentación ante diversos estímulos discriminativos disparadores del deseo de fumar; en la misma línea Goldade et al (2012), Novoa-Gómez et al (2011) y Rodríguez y Londoño (2010, habían reportado que precisamente los fumadores con consumo más fuerte se sentían altamente tentados a consumir en contextos sociales y en situaciones de alto estrés.…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified