Capacity and Willingness as Antecedents of Individual Work Design Behaviors"I linked similar jobs together to maintain clearly defined roles, whilst also maintaining a chain of command. Clearly not everyone is a manager and people need to be aware who the person above and below them in the chain is (…). I think this is the most effective and efficient way to run a company smoothly."(Part time sales worker and study participant) Work design, or the content and organization of one's work tasks, activities, relationships and responsibilities (Parker, 2014), is one of the most important practical and theoretical topics in our field (Miner, 2003). Considerable evidence shows the positive effects of enriched work designs for individual and organizational outcomes (see the meta analysis by Humphrey, Nahrgang & Morgeson, 2007). An enriched work design is one in which incumbents have, for example, the job autonomy to make decisions, a variety of tasks, and an opportunity to use and develop their skills (Hackman & Oldham, 1976). Much evidence also exists from a stress perspective of having job demands that are not excessive, such as individuals not being overloaded, or excessively conflicted, in their roles (e.g., see meta analyses by Alarcon, 2011;Podsakoff, LePine, & LePine, 2007).Despite this evidence for the merits of psychologically well-designed work, poorly designed jobs continue to exist in many contemporary organizations, raising the important question as to why low quality work designs continue to be prevalent. One set of forces at play concerns the decisions, sometimes indirect and unconscious, that individuals in the local work context (e.g., managers, engineers) make that shape others' job designs.Preliminary and anecdotal evidence suggests that individuals in the workplace often do not know how to design or enable enriched work, over-relying on deeply ingrained principles of job simplification when decisions are made (Campion & Stevens, 1991).
Key:(*) Enriching work strategy selection. These items were used in the shorter version of the measure reported in Study 2.