2004
DOI: 10.1002/ecja.10228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel zone‐based hierarchical link state routing with location search technique applying hierarchical request for mobile ad hoc networks

Abstract: SUMMARYTo reduce communications overhead and location search overhead and to realize a hierarchical network, we propose multilevel zone-based hierarchical link state (ZHLS) routing with a location search technique applying hierarchical request for mobile ad hoc networks. The proposed protocol reduces the communication overhead by hierarchizing the network into multilevel zones. In this protocol, a high-level zone consists of several low-level zones. To reduce location search overhead, location search is perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Destination Sequence Distance Vector (DSDV) [15][16][17][18], Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) [19][20][21] and Wireless Routing Protocol (WRP) [22] [23] are some of the most investigated proactive routing protocols. Finally hybrid routing protocols combines the advantages of proactive and reactive routing protocols as the Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP)) [24][25][26] and Zone-based Hierarchical Link State Routing Protocol (ZHLS) [27] [28]. Each type of these routing protocols could be further classified into single path as AODV, DSR and ZRP and multipath routing protocols as Ad hoc on-demand multipath distance vector routing (AOMDV) [29][30][31][32][33], Multipath Dynamic Source Routing (MP-DSR) [34] [35] and Routing On-demand Acyclic Multipath (ROAM) [36] [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Destination Sequence Distance Vector (DSDV) [15][16][17][18], Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) [19][20][21] and Wireless Routing Protocol (WRP) [22] [23] are some of the most investigated proactive routing protocols. Finally hybrid routing protocols combines the advantages of proactive and reactive routing protocols as the Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP)) [24][25][26] and Zone-based Hierarchical Link State Routing Protocol (ZHLS) [27] [28]. Each type of these routing protocols could be further classified into single path as AODV, DSR and ZRP and multipath routing protocols as Ad hoc on-demand multipath distance vector routing (AOMDV) [29][30][31][32][33], Multipath Dynamic Source Routing (MP-DSR) [34] [35] and Routing On-demand Acyclic Multipath (ROAM) [36] [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The convergence indicator deals with the development of technology and demand, which allows service providers to adopt innovative services and new models suitable for IoT applications. These simulation parameters provide an insight on network lifetime [49] as indicated in Figure 8. The heterogeneous mobile network has a better network convergence factor than its stationary counterpart.…”
Section: Throughput Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although designed for the same type of network, the features of each protocol show several differences. Table-driven routing protocols include destination sequenced distance vector (DSDV) (Perkins and Bhagwat, 1994), wireless routing protocol (WRP) (Johnson et al, 2001), global state routing (GSR) (Pei et al, 2000), fisheye state routing (FSR) (Pei et al, 2000), hierarchical state routing (HSR) (Pei et al, 1999), zone-based hierarchical link state routing protocol (ZHLS) (Takahashi et al, 2005), clusterhead gateway switching routing (CGSR) (Chiang et al, 1997).…”
Section: Mobile Ad Hoc Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%