2022
DOI: 10.3934/jcd.2021025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilinear POD-DEIM model reduction for 2D and 3D semilinear systems of differential equations

Abstract: <p style='text-indent:20px;'>We are interested in the numerical solution of coupled semilinear partial differential equations (PDEs) in two and three dimensions. Under certain assumptions on the domain, we take advantage of the Kronecker structure arising in standard space discretizations of the differential operators and illustrate how the resulting system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) can be treated directly in matrix or tensor form. Moreover, in the framework of the proper orthogonal decom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To build the corrected form PODc (24) and POD-DEIMc (25) we choose R = 80 ≈ ρ sol . In Figure 8(c) we show the relative error E(u, r) for the unknown u in (19) for increasing values of the dimension of the reduced space r. Similar behaviour has been obtained for the variable v (not reported).…”
Section: Test 2: Schnakenberg Modelsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To build the corrected form PODc (24) and POD-DEIMc (25) we choose R = 80 ≈ ρ sol . In Figure 8(c) we show the relative error E(u, r) for the unknown u in (19) for increasing values of the dimension of the reduced space r. Similar behaviour has been obtained for the variable v (not reported).…”
Section: Test 2: Schnakenberg Modelsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…• the errors E(u, r) defined in (19), obtained for all the surrogate models proposed and for r ≤ r max where r max ≤ ρ sol ;…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The cost of assembling the operators scales with the dimension of the full‐order problem (Nnormalh$N\rm _h$), and by consequence, the efficiency gains that can be achieved with ROMs are limited. This drawback is often referred to as the lifting bottleneck, reflecting the fact that the evaluation of the nonlinear terms implied a lift back to the original dimension of the full‐order problem and then a projection to the reduced order 6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%