2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10709-008-9293-3
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilocus phylogeography and phylogenetics using sequence-based markers

Abstract: We review recent trends in phylogeography and phylogenetics and argue that these two fields stand to be reunited by the common yardstick provided by sequence and SNP data and by new multilocus methods for phylogenetic analysis. Whereas the modern incarnation of both fields was spawned by PCR approaches applied to mitochondrial DNA in the late 1980s, the two fields diverged during the 1990s largely due to the adoption by phylogeographers of microsatellites, in contrast to the adoption of nuclear sequence data b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
233
0
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
3
233
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…In three of these four cases, the molecular markers used to assay the nuclear genome were microsatellites. It is important to note that because of their complex mutational patterns, microsatellites may imply higher gene flow than might otherwise be estimated from other nuclear markers with a simpler mutation mechanisms, such as SNPs (Brito & Edwards 2008). While differences in the biogeographic patterns between microsatellites and mtDNA are not necessarily expected, it would be valuable in the future for some of these cases to be confirmed with additional multi-locus nuclear markers.…”
Section: Box 3 Mitochondrial Structure In the Absence Of Geographic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In three of these four cases, the molecular markers used to assay the nuclear genome were microsatellites. It is important to note that because of their complex mutational patterns, microsatellites may imply higher gene flow than might otherwise be estimated from other nuclear markers with a simpler mutation mechanisms, such as SNPs (Brito & Edwards 2008). While differences in the biogeographic patterns between microsatellites and mtDNA are not necessarily expected, it would be valuable in the future for some of these cases to be confirmed with additional multi-locus nuclear markers.…”
Section: Box 3 Mitochondrial Structure In the Absence Of Geographic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IM simultaneously estimates divergence between two populations and the rate of gene flow between them. Importantly, this coalescent approach incorporates the stochasticity of mutation and genetic drift when calculating parameters, which in turn are associated with populations rather than genes (Brito and Edwards 2008). Thus, the key output of IM, in Bayesian parlance, is credibility intervals for each parameter -the 90% highest posterior densities (HPDs).…”
Section: Paraphyly Between Species and Hypothesis Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technology has led to the sequencing of large numbers of nearly complete transcriptomes (3), high-resolution genetic mapping (4), population genetic studies (5), and phylogeographic analysis of methicillin-resistant bacteria based on whole-genome sequences (6). For many species, however, such genomic resources are modest or not available, and fine-scale resolution of population dynamics or phylogeographies has been based on mitochondrial or chloroplast DNA, microsatellites, or a combination of these approaches (7). Here, we present a cost-and labor-effective method to resolve the postglacial phylogeography of a nonmodel organism, the North American pitcher plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii (Coq.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%