Second International Workshop on Semantic Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP 2007) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/smap.2007.4414385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimedia Reasoning with f-SHIN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The following table provides a few examples of initially extracted concepts from MPEG-7 descriptors and inferred concepts using fuzzy-DL reasoning. More extended examples on the use of fuzzy-DLs in the context of multimedia processing and interpretation can be found in [9,46].…”
Section: Fuzzy Extensions Of Owl and Dlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following table provides a few examples of initially extracted concepts from MPEG-7 descriptors and inferred concepts using fuzzy-DL reasoning. More extended examples on the use of fuzzy-DLs in the context of multimedia processing and interpretation can be found in [9,46].…”
Section: Fuzzy Extensions Of Owl and Dlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a significant share of the proposed DLs based approaches, image interpretation translates to augmenting the explicitly asserted data, made available via image analysis, with additional ones that are derived through the application of inference over the known only objects and relationships. Indicative approaches include amongst others the works presented in [3,4,5,6,7]. The underlying assumption is that the analysis provided descriptions correspond to all relevant information.…”
Section: Open Vs Closed World Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuzzy DLs have been proposed in [24] for the purpose for semantic multimedia retrieval; the fuzzy annotations however are assumed to be available. Fuzzy DLs have been proposed recently in [25] and [26] for enhancing machine learning based extracted image annotations and document classification respectively; however, neither approach addresses the problem of resolving semantic inconsistencies in the initially extracted descriptions.…”
Section: Relevant Workmentioning
confidence: 99%