2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimission observations of the old nova GK Per during the 2015 outburst

Abstract: The remarkable old nova and an intermediate polar (IP) -GK Per was observed with Swift, the Chandra HETG and NuSTAR during its recent dwarf nova (DN) outburst in March -April 2015. Monitoring the outburst, we noticed several processes occurring on different time scales, such as: the slow evolution of the very soft X-ray emission (below 0.6 keV) during the first two weeks of the outburst and the very fast saturation of the X-ray flux above 1 keV. The Swift UVOT lights curves also showed different behaviour, dep… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For T CrB, RS Oph, BX Mon, V3890 Sgr & V745 Sco the secondaries are in the range of M2 III -M5.5 III types and for GK Per the secondary is K5 V type. These results are in line with the fact that recurrence period of the systems with M-type giants are ∼ 20 -80 yrs as the mass loss rate of M type giants ∼ 10 −5 -10 −6 M /yr (Wannier & Sahai 1986, Zemko et al 2017. For the classical nova GK Per mass accretion rate is much slower (∼ 10 −8 M /yr) (Zemko et al 2017) due to K type secondary.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For T CrB, RS Oph, BX Mon, V3890 Sgr & V745 Sco the secondaries are in the range of M2 III -M5.5 III types and for GK Per the secondary is K5 V type. These results are in line with the fact that recurrence period of the systems with M-type giants are ∼ 20 -80 yrs as the mass loss rate of M type giants ∼ 10 −5 -10 −6 M /yr (Wannier & Sahai 1986, Zemko et al 2017. For the classical nova GK Per mass accretion rate is much slower (∼ 10 −8 M /yr) (Zemko et al 2017) due to K type secondary.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Therefore, the states of the system with the very different accretion rates are observed, so the magnetospheric radius in this system is expected to differ in quiescence and outburst. We attempted to investigate whether this is indeed the case (Suleimanov et al 2016) using a NuSTAR observation of GK Per during the latest outburst (Zemko et al 2017), and Swift/BAT and INTEGRAL hard X-ray spectra of the source in quiescence. This allowed to estimate the magnetosphere size respectively using observed break frequency, and from PSR model under assumption that the mass of WD is the same in both cases.…”
Section: Nustar Observations Of Gk Permentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a distance of 10 kpc (see Section 5.1.2), this would imply an absolute X-ray luminosity of ∼ 7.8 × 10 37 erg s −1 (in the range 15 -50 Å; 0.248 -0.827 KeV), which seems absurd because it is four orders of magnitude higher compared to heated polar caps of magnetic CVs (e.g. Zemko et al 2017 and references therein; see also Section 5.4). It is worth noting that even at shorter distances (3 -5 kpc; see Appendix A) this luminosity is still three orders of magnitude higher compared to heated polar caps of magnetic CVs.…”
Section: Chandra High-resolution X-ray Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%