2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53773-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal Cleavable Reporters for Quantifying Carboxy and Amino Groups on Organic and Inorganic Nanoparticles

Abstract: Organic and inorganic nanoparticles (NPs) are increasingly used as drug carriers, fluorescent sensors, and multimodal labels in the life and material sciences. These applications require knowledge of the chemical nature, total number of surface groups, and the number of groups accessible for subsequent coupling of e.g., antifouling ligands, targeting bioligands, or sensor molecules. To establish the concept of catch-and-release assays, cleavable probes were rationally designed from a quantitatively cleavable d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantification of FG and ligands on NM surfaces can be carried out by solution phase NMR techniques and by solid-state NMR. It typically involves the addition of an internal standard of known concentration and known, high purity, that is chosen to reveal NMR signals (chemical shift) well separated from the NMR signals originating from the FG or ligands of interest and the matrix [ 51 , 89 ]. Particularly for solution NMR, it must also be considered that the NMR signals of the FG or ligands bound to a NM surface can significantly change compared to the signals of the free molecule or FG in solution.…”
Section: Other Methods For Fg Quantification On Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The quantification of FG and ligands on NM surfaces can be carried out by solution phase NMR techniques and by solid-state NMR. It typically involves the addition of an internal standard of known concentration and known, high purity, that is chosen to reveal NMR signals (chemical shift) well separated from the NMR signals originating from the FG or ligands of interest and the matrix [ 51 , 89 ]. Particularly for solution NMR, it must also be considered that the NMR signals of the FG or ligands bound to a NM surface can significantly change compared to the signals of the free molecule or FG in solution.…”
Section: Other Methods For Fg Quantification On Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both methods can also be applied to detect elements that directly correspond to ligands and FG native on the NM surface, and thus, the total amount of FG, or to detect specific labels conjugated or associated to the FG, and hence, the number of derivatizable FG. Examples for the latter case present the quantification of elements such as sulfur present in certain dyes or cleavable probes [64,89,127], or the use of metal ion containing reporters [173]. ICP-OES has been used to quantify FG on various NM such as carbon-based NM, noble metal NP, polymer beads, and lanthanide-based NP [127,[174][175][176][177].…”
Section: Mass Spectrometry and Atomic Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations