2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal imaging of repetition priming: Using fMRI, MEG, and intracranial EEG to reveal spatiotemporal profiles of word processing

Abstract: Repetition priming is a core feature of memory processing whose anatomical correlates remain poorly understood. In this study, we use advanced multimodal imaging (functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography; MEG) to investigate the spatiotemporal profile of repetition priming. We use intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) to validate our fMRI/MEG measurements. Twelve controls completed a semantic judgment task with fMRI and MEG that included words presented once (new, 'N') and w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
2
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
48
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Review of the literature shows that extensive and systematic ERP research has been conducted on English and other alphabetic scripts in the past three decades, however, no study has reported effects similar to the present N200 and in particular its repetition enhancement effect [37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. A convincing case is that Xu et al [33] followed exactly the same paradigm as a study on English and Spanish [44] except using Chinese words and Chinese participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Review of the literature shows that extensive and systematic ERP research has been conducted on English and other alphabetic scripts in the past three decades, however, no study has reported effects similar to the present N200 and in particular its repetition enhancement effect [37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. A convincing case is that Xu et al [33] followed exactly the same paradigm as a study on English and Spanish [44] except using Chinese words and Chinese participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The present results are based on FreeSurfer estimates of morphometry, however the findings are likely to generalize to other structural estimation algorithms as well (e.g., ANTs, FSL, CIVET). As mentioned above, biased structural imaging may impair within‐ and between‐modality image registration, but also functional localization methods, and analyses that require accurate mapping to anatomical surfaces [McDonald et al, 2010; Wig et al, 2014], all of which often rely on accurate characterization of brain anatomy. Such problems with image registration may be exacerbated in cross‐cohort comparisons by warping T1w anatomical scans to a template image with varying degrees of success due to differences in motion‐related artifacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying task followed an event-related, semantic judgment task where participants pressed a button with their left index finger each time a target word (i.e., name of an animal; n = 24 target words per run), interspersed with new words, repeating words, and false font sequences, appeared on the screen. A similar, block-design implementation of this task is detailed in McDonald et al (2010). In the event-related design, a stimulus appeared on the screen each 1.5-3 sec (M inter-stimulus interval = 1.9 sec).…”
Section: Task-regressed Hippocampal Functional Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%