Multimode authentication based Electronic voting Kiosk using Raspberry Pi

Gurubasavanna, M. G.; Shariff, Saleem Ulla; MAMATHA, R.; Sathisha, N

doi:10.1109/i-smac.2018.8653726

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The online voting is utilized the electronic tools for polling and totalling the votes for e-voting [23]. The voters can select any candidate from anywhere by casting their votes through any electronic medium and the election commission is liable to gather these votes [8,24]. The e-voting [9] is an efficient mechanism rather than conventional voting due to greater competence, minimum time consuming, high robustness and maximum scalability.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving the End to End Protection in E-voting using BVM - Blockchain based e-Voting Mechanism

Gupta,

Shukla

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The voting is always a crucial topic of public attention for democratic reasons. Due to its simplicity, ease of use, and low cost, e-voting is frequently used for such decision outcomes. The tremendous authority and intervening data in current e-voting systems, however, make them risky and make it difficult to achieve correct equity and clarity in e-voting. By combining e-voting with blockchain technology, these issues are resolved while providing reorganisation and intervention-resistant characteristics. A voter's improper manipulation, such as absenteeism, frequent voting, or non-party voting, may also undermine fairness. A verifier is therefore required to check the e-voting mechanism in order to ensure its effectiveness and control the process equality and fairness. In this paper, a Blockchain based e-Voting Mechanism (BVM) is developed for providing the end to end security and fairness for the transparent voting. This mechanism also provides a Zero-knowledge Proof (ZP) based verifier to inspect the voting procedure against voter`s misoperations and uses a Master-key Administration (MA) based public key cryptography to attack prevention. The utilization of blockchain technology ensures transparency, tamper resistance, and a high level of data integrity, making it a promising choice for modernizing and enhancing the electoral process. Also the performance of BVM has been compared and analysed based on time complexity, security analysis, performance factors like delay and throughput and antiattack examination.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving the End to End Protection in E-voting using BVM - Blockchain based e-Voting Mechanism

Gupta,

Shukla

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Different types of improvements to e-voting have been done to provide easy election organization, easy participation, and low cost. Accordingly, various enabling technologies have been adapted ranging from biometric authentication to remote voting [6,7] to kiosk systems [8] or to mobile voting systems [9]. Nowadays, the security and privacy of blockchain platforms have attracted great attention.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Manipulation Prevention Model for Blockchain-Based E-Voting Systems

Taş

Tanrıöver

2021

Security and Communication Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Security and trust are seen as the most important issues in electronic voting systems. Therefore, it is necessary to use cryptographic procedures to ensure anonymity, security, privacy, and reliability in these systems. In recent years, blockchain has become one of the most commonly used methods for securing data storage and transmission through decentralized applications. E-voting is one of these application areas. However, data manipulation is still seen as a major potential problem in e-voting systems. In theproposed model, administrators or miners are prevented from previewing election results which are normally accessible data due to the blockchain structure. A double-layer encryption model is proposed and tested to prevent manipulations that may occur with the election results. It is ensured that the election results can be counted after the participation of all stakeholders at the end. In this way, potential manipulations may be prevented during the election period. As a result of the model, the privacy of voters is ensured, no central authority is needed, and the recorded votes are kept in a distributed structure.

show abstract