2008
DOI: 10.1002/etep.226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiobjective distributed generation placement using fuzzy goal programming with genetic algorithm

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper presents a new method to determine the locations and sizes of Distributed Generations (DGs) for loss reduction and voltage profile enhancement in distribution systems. The strategic placement of DG can help reduce power losses and improve feeder voltage profile. Fuzzy Goal Programming (FGP) is adopted to handle the multiobjective DG placement problem incorporating the voltage characteristics of each individual load component. The original objective functions and constraints are transformed in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[23] 2007 2 1 ✓ ---MCS embedded in GA planning methodology is proposed to improve the accuracy for stochastic DG integration with tradeoff solution. [24] 2008 3 1 ✓ ---NSGA-II along with max-min approach solves MODGP problem considering future load uncertainties and risk management [25] 2008 6 1 ✓ ---EA is employed to solve IMO considering both time-varying generation and demand behavior aiming at various technical impacts of DGP [26] 2008 2 1 ✓ ---GA with goal programming methodology finds a solution with associated uncertainties among MO and constraints. [27] 2008 3 1 ✓ ---The proposed NSGA algorithm finds arrangements for wind-based DGs regarding compromise solution among contrasting objectives.…”
Section: Planning Techniques Based On Evaluation Methods In Multi-objmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[23] 2007 2 1 ✓ ---MCS embedded in GA planning methodology is proposed to improve the accuracy for stochastic DG integration with tradeoff solution. [24] 2008 3 1 ✓ ---NSGA-II along with max-min approach solves MODGP problem considering future load uncertainties and risk management [25] 2008 6 1 ✓ ---EA is employed to solve IMO considering both time-varying generation and demand behavior aiming at various technical impacts of DGP [26] 2008 2 1 ✓ ---GA with goal programming methodology finds a solution with associated uncertainties among MO and constraints. [27] 2008 3 1 ✓ ---The proposed NSGA algorithm finds arrangements for wind-based DGs regarding compromise solution among contrasting objectives.…”
Section: Planning Techniques Based On Evaluation Methods In Multi-objmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EA is employed to solve IMO considering both time-varying generation and demand behavior aiming at various technical impacts of DGP [26] 2008 2 1 ✓ ---GA with goal programming methodology finds a solution with associated uncertainties among MO and constraints. [27] 2008…”
Section: Planning Techniques Based On Evaluation Methods In Multi-objmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The DG units change the flow over the feeders of the distribution network by injecting active and reactive power to their interconnection node. They may cause different benefits for Distribution Network Operators (DNOs) as reported in the literature, such as: network investment deferral [1], [2], active loss reduction [3]- [6], environmental emission reduction [7] and reliability improvement [8]. These benefits are obtained just if they are connected in the appropriate sizes and locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes a chance for DNO to identify the technical characteristics of the network and provide economic signals for investors to know how much and where they should invest. Most of the reported models and methods of the literature deal with the DG sizing and placement problem in a DG-owned DNO environment, like [3], [9], [12], [15], [16]. In [3], a fuzzy goal programming is proposed to solve a multi-objective model which minimizes the active losses and improves voltage profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%