2017
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2016.2574499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiobjective Optimization of Medium-Frequency Transformers for Isolated Soft-Switching Converters Using a Genetic Algorithm

Abstract: The main challenge of medium-frequency transformers is the high number of design parameters, constraints and objectives, and the difficulty of handling them on a particular design. This paper presents a novel computer-aided optimal design for MF transformers using a multiobjective genetic algorithm, in particular the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). The proposed methodology has the aim of reaching the best MF transformer for a given power converter topology, by optimizing transformer effic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
98
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among numerous metaheuristic methods, Genetic Algorithm (GA) [10] and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [11] have been widely utilized to design the circuity of a power converter. The GA can be applied to optimize the medium-frequency transformer [12] of isolated converter, heatsink and bus capacitor volumes [13] of a three-phase inverter to archive minimum weight, losses and cost, with respect to constraints of design specification and physical limitation of components. The PSO, combined with Differential Evolution (DE), helps find an optimal transformer design for the Dual-Active-Bridge converter [14], the resonant tank of isolate bidirectional series resonant converter [15], and the inductor using EE core geometry [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among numerous metaheuristic methods, Genetic Algorithm (GA) [10] and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [11] have been widely utilized to design the circuity of a power converter. The GA can be applied to optimize the medium-frequency transformer [12] of isolated converter, heatsink and bus capacitor volumes [13] of a three-phase inverter to archive minimum weight, losses and cost, with respect to constraints of design specification and physical limitation of components. The PSO, combined with Differential Evolution (DE), helps find an optimal transformer design for the Dual-Active-Bridge converter [14], the resonant tank of isolate bidirectional series resonant converter [15], and the inductor using EE core geometry [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, almost all researches have formulated a single objective formulation (efficiency, or weight, or cost [8]) or aggregated multiple conflicting objectives (weight, and loss, and cost) into one single objective. The multi-objective optimization of transformer design was solved by the Non-dominated Sorted Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) [12]; however, the final design selected from Pareto-solutions was not explained clearly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the coordinate control strategy discussed in this section is a problem when solving P i (t)/ Q i (t) of each SL. For this kind of problem, some optimization methodologies have been used in many fields: A. Garcia-Bediaga used a genetic algorithm to decide the optimal design parameters of a medium frequency transformer [27]; CF . Juang applied the ant colony optimization algorithm in fuzzy controller in order to improve the design efficiency and control performance [28]; and Y. Wang used PSO to search for the optimum auxiliary power unit operating point in the dynamic combined cost map in order to improve the emission performance of hybrid electric vehicles [29].…”
Section: Load Control Methods Of Multi-slmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the full-analytical model, the derived optimum is used (f opt,0 and n opt,0 ). For the two semi-numerical models, the optimum design (with respect to the efficiency) is selected with a mixed-integer multi-constrained genetic algorithm [27], [47]. The results are shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Scaling Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the different local minima are flat, implying that designs located near a minimum can be almost as good as the minimum itself. Therefore, a robust optimization algorithm (e.g., particle swarm and genetic) should be selected [27], [47]. For designs with many discrete variables, a brute-force search algorithm may be the only practicable solution.…”
Section: Critical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%